[ G. R. No. 40761. August 04, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40761. August 04, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40761
[ G. R. No. 40761. August 04, 1934 ]
ROSENDO BANAAD AND ENCARNACION CRUZ, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. ROSARIO DAYO AND PEDRO DIONIO, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Laguna_________, dated the _________18th__________ day of __________August_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the sole modification of eliminating therefrom the sum of P50.00 as attorney's fees, with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 58193. August 30, 1984 ](216 Phil. 464)
- [ A.M. No. 12-8-07-CA. June 16, 2015 ](760 Phil. 62; 112 OG No. 3, 231 (January 18, 2016))
- G.R. No. 148199, November 24, 2004
- A.M. No. RTJ-97-1371, January 22, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 175073. August 15, 2011 ](671 Phil. 132)
- [ G.R. No. 191002. March 17, 2010 ](629 Phil. 629)
- G.R. No. 233697, July 10, 2019
- [ G.R. No. L-24704. July 10, 1967 ]
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。