CTA Resolutions CTA Case No. 37493749 1987-01-20
CTA Case No. 3749 (Resolution)
.VP\JBLIC 0 F t't-fF P~tUPPtN.i'� r �. _. ~ou T ~.- �.�-.f'~Ul...~ QUJ::%01'1 C 1""' ion r, - vecs � � C . t . A. CASE � 3749 TH � co AL x--- -------x SOLUTIO lt appe r1DQ th t p 1 1 r 1� no long r - �� his ,.. r 1nt.ereat i � 1 1� 1 1nd1e 1 he " ot Cl Case a- '� n � file 0 J D ry 19 7 th that erein th ta 11ab1 1t1ea a uQht to be coll t. h lre y n 1 y of e r au n cu ive " r � 4 hpe itio r pay- 1 9 t. co pro 1 e a. un f �� � 383.00 v1 � Cen r 1 nk on!i e tion R � 7 7 74 t r �l � in j io rt c r a th � 1d 10 1 her by De 1t1o for revi wbe or in ly, le he de ir th it � cas c nai- red c rntin t � Ci y, e r 1 � Jan a y 20, 19 7. 1
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 3982 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3982)
- LEVEL UP, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9424)
- CTA Case No. 1061 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1061)
- LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8889)
- BASES CONVERSION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8757)
- Mirant Navotas Corporation v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7437)
- CTA Case No. 1807 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1807)
- CTA Case No. 3516 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3516)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。