[ G.R. No. 30814. March 05, 1929 ]
[ G.R. No. 30814. March 05, 1929 ]
[ G.R. No. 30814. March 05, 1929 ]
ROSALIO GONZALES, PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
OSTRAND, J.:
This action is brought under section 513 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner alleges that he has occupied lot No. 2640 of Mexico Cadastre, Pampanga, since time immemorial and has religiously paid land tax on it; that he remembers that he filed a written claim to said lot in the cadastral proceedings, but that said claim had probably been lost by reason of the excessive amount of work imposed upon the functionaries of the trial court; that having filed his claim, he believed that the court had adjudicated the lot to him, but that on November 24, 1928, he found, much to his surprise, that it, on August 29, 1918, had been declared public property.
The Director of Lands opposes the petition on the ground that the petitioner has allowed more than ten years to pass from the time the decision in the aforesaid cadastral case was rendered, without attempting to ascertain whether the land in question had been adjudicated to him.
In our opinion, the objection of the Director of Lands is well taken. The fact that no certificate of title was issued to the petitioner was sufficient to put him on inquiry, and it could not have been difficult for him to obtain the necessary information. His indifference and negligence cannot be regarded as excusable and, if so, an action under section 513 of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot be maintained.
The petition is therefore denied, and the case is dismissed without costs. So ordered.
Johnson, Street, Malcolm, Johns, Romualdez, and Villa-Real, JJ., concur.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 220378. June 30, 2021 ](906 Phil. 314)
- G.R. No. 143340, August 15, 2001
- [ A.C. NO. 5246. May 02, 2006 ](522 Phil. 386)
- [ G.R. No. 61024. May 19, 1992 ](284-A Phil. 513; 89 OG No. 9, 1099 (March 1, 1993))
- A.M. No. MTJ-01-1350, July 20, 2001
- G.R. No. 203335, April 22, 2014
- G.R. Nos. 152624-25, February 05, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 62648. November 22, 1985 ](224 Phil. 385)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。