PILIPINAS KYOHRITSU INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Court of Tax Appeals QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION PILIPINAS KYOHRITSU, INC ., CTA CASE NO. 9447 Petitioner, Members: -versus- CASTANEDA, JR., Chairperson CASANOVA, and MANAHAN, JJ. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL Promulgated : REVENUE , Respondent. MAR 1 4 2018 / x ---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--------x RESOLUTION l���'f"' � Finding petitioner's "Ex-Parte Motion to Withdraw the Petition" , filed on February 9, 2018 to be well-taken, and there being no objection from the respondent, the same is hereby GRANTED. WHEREFORE , the case in caption is deemed WITHDRAWN and considered CLOSED and TERMINATED . SO ORDERED. 9. c . C~A~SoTA-N4ED1~9,.,.JR. C. JUANfTO Associate Justice $- ~~/-~ CAESAR A. CASANOVA CATHERINE T. MANAHAN Associate Justice Associate Justice
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ALE MART CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1983)
- UNIVATION MOTOR PHILIPPINES, INC. (FORMERLY NISSAN MOTOR PHILIPPINES, INC.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2178)
- QUADFOODS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10419)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SMALLVILLE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE CORPORATION ANGELBERT BALASICO, THELMA BALASICO (9 F Vicente Madrigal Building, 6793 Ayala Ave., 1227 Makati City)(CTA Case No. O-1203)
- MIDTOWN PRINTING CO., INC. v. HON. CARLOS G. DOMIGUEZ in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of Finance, and HON. CAESAR R. DULAY, in his capacity as incumbent Commissioner of Internal Revenue,(CTA Case No. 10055)
- EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 158)
- SCHAEFFLER PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10358)
- BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS v. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, THE LOCAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF THE PROVINCE OF BATANGAS, AND FORTUNATA G. LAT, in her capacity as THE PROVINCIAL TREASURER OF BATANGAS(CTA Case No. EB 1438)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。