[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 66-2009, June 02, 2009 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 66-2009, June 02, 2009 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 66-2009, June 02, 2009 ]
TO: ALL JUDGES
SUBJECT:
JURISDICTION OVER PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF THE OMBUDSMAN IN ADMINISTRATIVE CASES
It has come lo the attention of the Court that there are judges who take cognizance of petitions involving Ombudsman decisions in administrative cases notwithstanding that jurisdiction thereon properly belongs to the Court f Appeals.
All judges are therefore hereby reminded of the ruling of the Supreme Court in Macalalag vs. Ombudsman, et. al., G.R. No. 147995, 4 March 1004 , citing the leading case of Fabian vs. Desierto (G.R. No. 129742, 16 September 1998), that:
"all appeals from decisions of the Ombudsman in administrative disciplinary cases are x x x to be taken to the Court of Appeals under Rule 43 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedures."
Strict compliance is hereby enjoined.
__ 2 __June 2009. Untitled Document
JOSE P. PEREZ
Court Administrator
同类文件 Circulars
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 64-2007, June 19, 2007 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 109-2011, August 03, 2011 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 53-2007, May 21, 2007 ]
- [ SC ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 16-2002, March 21, 2002 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 220-2017, November 10, 2017 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 69-2019, May 02, 2019 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 31-2005, April 11, 2005 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 124-2012, November 15, 2012 ]
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。