C. S. ENRIQUEZ MECHANICAL SHOP CORP., Duly Represented by CARLITO V. ENRIQUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Republic of the Philippines COURT OF TAX APPEALS Quezon City First Division C.S. ENRIQUEZ MECHANICAL CTA Case No. 8758 SHOP CORP., duly Members: represented by CARLITO V. DEL ROSARIO, Chairperson UY, and ENRIQUEZ, MINDARO-GRULLA, J.J. Petitioner, -versus- COMMISSIONER OF Promulgated: ..?: D~ fn1 /'/'2"LI'-VM1J'/ INTERNAL REVENUE, 1 2014 Respondent. x---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Z:X RESOLUTION Petitioner's Compliance filed on September 22 , 2014 is NOTED. With petitioner's submission of the authority of Bautista Menzon and Associates Law Office to withdraw the subject Petition for Review as required by the Court in its Resolution dated July 22 , 2014 and there being no objection from respondent, petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Petition filed on June 26, 2014 is hereby GRANTED. The Petition for Review docketed as CTA Case No. 8758 is deemed WITHDRAWN. The said case is now considered CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED . (On Leave) Presiding Justice ERLINDA P. UY Associate Justice CUta:o N..M~~"' 6""~ CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- ZAMBOANGA WOODS PRODUCTS, INC. v COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 4290)
- MCKINSEY & CO. (PHILS.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8805)
- CTA Case No. 5393 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 5393)
- BRILLIANT CREATIONS PUBLISHING, INC., Duly Represented herein by its Authorized Representative, Ms. Ria A. Sablon v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CIR), BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE (BIR)(CTA Case No. 11043)
- PHILIPPINE ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1828)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MONTE SOLAR ENERGY, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2919)
- PHIL. GOLD PROCESSING & REFINING CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8048)
- PEOPLESUPPORT (PHILIPPINES), INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (consolidated with Case Nos. 7404 & 7499)(CTA Case No. 7430)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。