CTA Case No. 2522 (Decision)
1 0' T 0 t.1tlon � v c, � � � � A .. 252" u t .� po .r h :...i n '� on .r. '- c ' " l 7 ~ ........ 'h l c OI c ln r ,.. in I .:c n / o !J"'l .. 1. 1 J: � /7 � "" tt un � 26/' 1- � �ro .,, . o. 0 t c. . io of :io ., � dc � u -c 0 �f t � n c �p 1 l -u � r n -orp ). -r 1 e � in d ' en hi B. � �th r v ~ l I .�.. r l I � '\
.,. I I. 25:22 ''CO. ho. ttH~ �� � i t . 7":' ) � .L ,'Jll�ct iJ t� s ot r �n ~~!."- :i w:l 't~g t.h ! .r :. ), tit.L-, r c1 f"'J: ttl 0 � * 1 .. ' , r. .0 (,5 irJ 1 t.() o f ~~~;: �,~ 0 i ' ~ ~-~ .. ".h 1n l ('eci- "' () . i M . �;c. ~ - ion ll6 c ~ -' .o. .f r e �~ � ... ( p r u-� �i 80
0 A. 0 -l .:r E � � . 522 - 3- r .i t 81
z. e. 2522 - co n h r it J%' l r 1 �b un � th .. or 1 to h ubj c rti ... ue 0 h ntJ or q 0 ~ � citing ~ h .. or 0 lon ho wr � on h 0 ~r ,n II r .1e n X: l' y ; ..
- .. 2 ?. - !.1 ... , 83
.l � 25 ndr co �� I c v.� ...... m. . ""to � �� c .' .. 9'sr;� ' c . 27. l � nr)ral ~ ill � � �� ~.-. . T . r c o . ?1 � 2r ::sy �� Inc. � ��� ~� t� 7 . J.97 I ::o l 'I 2' ; . p n' <:: � .. .. s . 0 � Jf u...,t >roCl . c . � � ..... \< � � ( 17 ) r ...ly ;1 (; y s r ,. 't: r- d 0 t: 1 !:'t. ' i � .. � � � 43 1" . 0 if l~ . 8 !l
� - o ::ex � 2 22 .... 7 -
� � 1 0 i -1 � � � u: / ~- . . {, , ;~ 8 6
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- BASES CONVERSION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8473)
- CTA Case No. 4658 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4658)
- BENCHMARK MARKETING CORP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9296)
- CTA Case No. 5064 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5064)
- CTA Case No. 5100 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5100)
- TOLEDO POWER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case No. 7294)(CTA Case No. 7233)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 816)
- CTA Case No. 6159 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6159)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。