CTA Case No. 2182 (Decision)
'i~I"'U ~t.lC OF THE PHILIPPl.NKa COURT OF TAX APPE.4.UJ QUEZON mn ... � .o � . c.._ OI :� f 31 �
i':. . c -2' i t '\tl .it:iJt .� I r�l.... r , J ~. l se a~ t 1.ha ;1 a���,. c ~:,. es . � -p .r� . .I' � I, 1~ 'u - ~1 '132
- 0 2. �'-' " b. thf.f s 3 � l~ 1. t 'Ce~ ! ( ) n 11 pt. .f..�. tt ....., I<! 1. 1~ 1 '1 ;.; i � -*i:i ... ..<..' c) ' .u r ' l.o~. th \.I.Uject ra L � ..::.:: ->.1.;1. J.J.� v ....r .i. ' .�iC.� .L~ ::s (1: 1c ce I u . ;; I bu c.r��� o.�: 1 0 jU. 8 'il 1 r c. .~.. . Cl' s ... ...., tel:ts t;r� ... l a c e 133
coi 1 �. ti!, ;u f et l t 0 p- io . e J. . lQ. b ' c �t 1 ~ ' 1 a tu- a ty o. lG;* . I t s~ 1 � clat� d by pet1t � ' ner t At y , a'"' cla1Q.e ) u - P r graph � .., t ut� .. ts s t ~' . i- tially a �U.nw:.. Cl.ll. 1 ' ~d u �e r 1 tu~a ... u~ h o ~ r nuL �rt ~ , �uri.ri .tmt r . r s '.ao � r t ..Le et- .o.Ll J p ,. a tt" Ctt. l l / .L ey r 1 lly 4110 e lc: ts, t~lw t t~'l .:-~~ ar sr:1u 1 tt 0 VOle ~ .I..inn f 4 1ca 1 t u. l i ct .r1 l e ' .r. z tL t all . ;~
t "" nl ., r ~ c . as Ol r-ic u o~� that c l til!. '' f,tc t e J�iJ.'f "�o.. is _o 'tO ;:; n .....~ th e rt c 4 ' L '.t- . BL<i'- �o..., is�" ou rul .a 1 � :.�ticles ') ' n pt lll � ~e:;t. ..r i..i Ol.l:/ (- �tu. t ' . ) ln '.".".. :.Lti .e.r the OJ~ ,...f.' "tt e. ' e(,;r. a i.�y r JuO#ticc ' ~u oru ry 13 ) ..,f '� o ' Ct.. ct s ~ot.1. w: I' sec ticn l '1U s.cu u b� c,. . ssit1 .. nlt -,1.0 t:rlp _ 7 � Ut'-p ra r _p �� ll t J �, � .' I" Vl'� c':... . <.a:urt ' .....,......,...~_ ..,.t Ulty i ' b $! vti L� t 1e Q inicn ~ of ttl , worth Jl"l .1... ~ of tH,tic 1 io1.. IU e:t !JCCt e n � 31� ( ) o:t. t.hi:l :;: �.~J�� f � nd c he I a lu u �le le ~ ti. . e t S J . t . l ill . ;;;; du i r e;> a(.;/.1G �e t ion. 14-vt t1_. Cod ... to 1 ru:u ci GSi ';/ tsl,;1cles . t a o;_;ecro ,, 13 5
6 i.ha 1' 4 l i it 0. 22 !l X 5''J � j rt. r c l' ls net $ y mentl- { 0. i l~ ' th - tt o~ .ii, 60 1 lJl j ( 'Ctl1! .... ar v.� . rti l i (! ..' .. . ti J. upo . .p 1:. t 0 ....t. J.l ~ oral tu . l 1u~� l l uic t " y ttl 1 f' Co DSit.J � 1. ro 0 eet 'tl ~ . cl f C't;i. the f tu arr c t. t.~e lu. n sla b,y p ti ivi:rJ 8 oulu iJI:. appr .. l st.i all . e J.1H \ � 'I -. v.3 , a w an h J ~.:r~ , ~ 't~l. ' p no. . c 136
- v� 'I I: era u 0 e l. i :u r ~i) {.A ri a 't !;tUL �. 0, nt .t ~ a �t a t, n t.l St..ld � .~ �t.l .... t.i;.; �a '� o...~ v '' e~ o.. ~ �i ul., t l~?l � i' 137
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- PHILIPPINE AMUSEMENT AND GAMING CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND THE HEAD REVENUE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT, LARGE TAXPAYER SERVICE, in their official capacities as officers of the Bureau of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. EB 869)
- PLACER DOME TECHNICAL SERVICES (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6106)
- CTA Case No. 111 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 111)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PANAY POWER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2911)
- PRIMELINE PRODUCTS PHILIPPINES, INC., As represented by LCB LEO B. PILAPIL by Virtue of a Special Power of Authority duly Executed by the company thru their Board ofDirectors v. Hon. ALBERTO D. LINA COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 2275)
- PERCEPTION GAMING, INC., v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8509)
- CTA Case No. 5938 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5938)
- CTA Case No. 5617 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5617)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。