CTA Case No. 3049 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THr� PHILIPPJN&a COURT OF TAX APPf.A.U ot:&7.0N CITY L D�� - I ~ I 1 VI HI �c� oL. T. D� � �� TD IA 0 Petitio ra. - ersu - c��� c o. 3049 0I -X � X- ~ ~ - ~ - - - - ~ 0L 10 cting on petitioners� � otio 0 1 fil d n Jun s. 1 1 n the g o t t th ir cla.i for tax ere t i the a of 30.642 . 5 involved here..: in h d alrea y en approv y the ur a of Intern 1 venue. aa evidenced y Credit Me a . � 30 and 31 � in t � reapectiv a P2 . 123. 1 or a tot 1 o� P30. 642 . s. both ated Dece r � � 19 o. and t r beinq objectio on h art of rea en � th id motion ia ereb A D. ecordinqly. let the tition for review ee d 51
OLUTI C A CAS� 0 . 3049 .. 2 - withdr�wn nd the abov -entitled e se considered elose4 en ter ineted. SO D �D. ue on City. June 11. 19 1 . 52
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- FOUNDEVER PHILIPPINES CORPORATION (formerly SITEL PHILIPPINES CORPORATION) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2710)
- CTA Case No. 2924 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2924)
- PARITY PACKAGING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8825)
- CTA Case No. 1477 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1477)
- CTA Case No. 1357 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1357)
- LAPANDAY AGRICULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10072)
- CTA Case No. 6381 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 6381)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PET PLANS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2857)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。