[ G. R. No. 36374. May 25, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 36374. May 25, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 36374
[ G. R. No. 36374. May 25, 1934 ]
CRESENCIO EXCONDE, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, FELIX A. GESMUNDO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________10th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tayabas________, dated the __________24th__________ day of __________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__40.00________, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. NO. 157232. December 10, 2007 ](564 Phil. 504)
- [ G.R. No. 256798. July 10, 2023 ](943 Phil. 756)
- [ G.R. No. L-36488. July 25, 1983 ](208 Phil. 451)
- [ G.R. No. 213286. August 26, 2015 ](767 Phil. 857)
- [ G.R. No. 227523. August 29, 2018 ](839 Phil. 360)
- [ G.R. No. L-4347. January 31, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 152234. April 15, 2010 ](632 Phil. 301)
- [ G.R. No. 48683. November 08, 1941 ](G.R. No. 48683)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。