IMPORTATION OF 567 PACKAGES STC PISTOLS, RIFLES, AND AMMUNITIONS, COVERED BY AWB NO. 00001511, WHICH ARRIVED ON A CHARTERED FLIGHT BRW752 ON NOVEMBER 18, 2002. (ESPINELLI TRADING) v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, NINOY AQUINO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (NAIA)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION ESPINELLI TRADING, Petitioner, -versus- C.T.A. CASE NO. 6990 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, ET AL. , Members : Respondents. CASTANEDA, JR., Chairman ; UY, and ENRIQUEZ, JJ. Promulgated : OCT 2�6 200�-/- - X- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -- - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- --X RESOLUTION Upon motion of the counsel for respondents, on the ground that this is the third time that counsel for petitioner failed to present Mr. Reynaldo C. Espinelli for the continuation of the direct examination, the direct testimony of Mr. Reynaldo C. Espinelli is stricken out of the records of this case and the case in caption is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute (Section 3, Rule 17 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended). SO ORDERED. ~<2 -~1~ � JUAN ITO C. CASTANEDA, JR. Associate justice AE~ :~tic'Ye ~~ RIQUEZ Associate Justice
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 4698 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4698)
- PHPC CO. LTD., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7772)
- PACIFIC PLAZA CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10199)
- BETHLEHEM HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10991)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. KINGSAM EXPRESS INCORPORATION and SAMUEL S. SANTOS, With address at No. 415 Miranda Building Mc Arthur Highway, Malinta, Valenzuela City (AT LARGE) [consol with O-522](CTA Case No. O-524)
- GS MTE GRAINS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8837)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. RPV ELECTRO TECHNOLOGY PHILIPPINES CORPORATION / ROLAND P. VASQUEZ (President)(CTA Case No. O-713)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILPLANS FIRST, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2351)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。