CTA Case No. 4403 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE P HILIPP I NES COURT OF TAX APPKALS QUE ZON CIY. Y HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner~ - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 4403 THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. >~---- - - - - - - - )�! RE S OLUTION Acting on petit i oner ' s motion filed on March 19~ 1992 for withdrawal of the petition for review in the above-entitled case on the ground that the deficiency tax involved herein has already been paid even prior to the issuance o f the deficiency assessment under RTR No . 7334 03 dated October 6~ 1981 and Confir mation Receipt No . A-0180821 dated October 7~ 1 9 8 1 as shown in the memorandum for Deputy Commissioner Eufracio D. Santos dated February 3~ 1992 recommend i ng the ca nce l l ation o f the assessment which recommendat i on was eventually approved by said Deputy Commi ssioner~ photostat copy of which is attached t o said motion as Annex A, we find the motion to be in order. ACCORDINGLY, the "Motion To Withdraw Petition" filed by petitioner is GRANTED. Let this petition 144
RESOLUTION - � CTA CASE NO. 4403 - 2- for review be considered withdrawn and this case deemed closed and terminated. SO ORDERED. Quezon City~ Metro Manila~ April 9~ 1992. Q., ..... C2.. O....Jt. ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Judge ST, L A DADIVAS-FA cting udge Judge 145
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 2137 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2137)
- MSCI HONG KONG LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9661)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SND99 FOOD CORPORATION and DANILO P. VITAN, JR. No 18 Caras De Andalucia, Visayas Ave., Culiat, Quezon City (At Large)(CTA Case No. O-848)
- CTA Case No. 4604 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4604)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. FAIVO PASCUAL BARTOLOME(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-113)
- ROBIN MITRA, as represented by Virgilio A. Abogado v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5868)
- CTA Case No. 1604 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1604)
- THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. JADE BROS FARM AND LIVESTOCK, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1566)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。