CTA Case No. 1855 (Decision)
0 � - ... .... c 1 ,, :r f ( � or th o n ot 11 a ae
- �t .) c -� 7; 1 1 � l: 8 v~
1t t � :_. 8 6
.. X f �
~r . '�- ' .1; \t ~ ' ~ � vi ha 11 � to t ~-----__.:.- t e J.d. '"' td. uJ'e � of '� --~-----...... � � ti � J' t to 4 l< 1 t I t f.llP.g l ly 1 c� 11 ly � ,I � Sll1d c1 th a 11 v y � Coll Qt ~ o ao . n -t 1 arl I .. � r 1.n 88
~ -,'~"" ~ - '' ,. / 6 t at lr ., t �. t a11 u'l;'""""'' � t�1 � p� 5 t . . . ...J l 1t � OUgtt ari Pl111nptnes widcl\ to D Vi o Ci y P� 1 at aatd � 1 s tt1 to 1 Q t I P}!reh r � :finrli .nd c ts. pap ~~nd ~o s go ar. e 1 r t>Jt. t I lt ""d lfi oo. ql ot. r er an ~i;C <1 ~ vs 1 r. ea a~a ae1au. � ;. 89 ' '.
.'� t. ! t lt ' liC � , nnw , ru 1 ' r c t h(!rw se r t n l,it 1 1t <' 5 1 \1 1 n.. ~l . 616), b l. t t � r ht.t. o ,, 90
-- I ' / '� .!) ... ~..... '" {'' c l 1: ss 8 't � ,. (' 0 r� �J ' .~ 2 u. " � 3 3 l doc .~1 nutJ !at; ry t � o1 � � �� � 1 � 1- ' '' '" 91
- �1 1. :1 a � t � ' j � � � 1:�� 92
., tollo a 80 I ai e � 0 rs , � � � Z' t'f 11 cu. ,, 93
'I.:c.. 1 :~�!) I .' [ lt � �" ' to db.er to tbe t'Ul b ' e 1as1btl1� y ot � . 1d nc proc 1 glaa b � n e1 11 lle.na tb n he co ete ay ide ce � � petitio or r .iginal a .1on. lt upan 11 c i .o , th .- l �party in l tere an ta t h t , the . ocu .eut ry I a iaul'e, the ev1 nee will I 1 e r ~ta~p.'f our 1 tbe �� a ,, ow ei thotr'en~ l n �ct1on in cou t
1m .I to, - o. 1 5J C CASE 8 J d~ne lilA dCClltll!eltnS l �i n .. �). a:t 1 .ne t .. 0 � tid a C1 tr, � c, �� � � 1 at � ot y tor ,h � dth\e 4 n1 1 .nee . , t pl.' t.Em.t t' e ' 8 J'i .,. or ro � we a � hat ,, ,. 95 !.
., t t t -t � 0 r 0 tb
f 1 .- 1' 00 � � - �� 1 r1 t .� !' ,. 9 7
--- " .c .f 1 11n 98
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5215 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5215)
- MISSOURI SQUARE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8688)
- KEPCO ILIJAN CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9261)
- GULF AIR COMPANY, PHILIPPINE BRANCH (GF) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 302)
- VERTEX INTERNATIONAL PRODUCT AND EXCHANGE CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT RICARDO LUZ, v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BUREAU OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 1160)
- LUCIO L. CO, SUSAN P. CO, FERDINAND VINCENT P. CO and PAMELA JUSTINE P. CO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8831)
- DENSO TECHNO PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7699)
- COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, represented by OIC-Regional Director, Maridur V. Rosario, Revenue Region No. 9A - CaBaMiRo, Sto. Tomas, Batangas, v. BASIC HOUSING SOLUTIONS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2723)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。