CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 240240 1957-05-16
CTA Case No. 240 (Decision)
/ 1\l!:.t'UULll. 0 '1' I P ILlP.PINEI COURT J AX APPEALS lANiU .-~ -----.~ --- .. eal 00 - c:l y t � f � 1 )1 � 216
� . ... ( ). f 0 � � o� � f � � nly o t 217
�c - -, ;,;, v on f �nt1 "'Ultl � t �- � p 1 � t. �� " nt n r~ � t. nd r Gt on .. hb n ' t I l.n 1b10 � 0 I � �nd1c t ho 1 � 1 .... fle&l ~tlt � ua d ~ t�. ( at '� n ern t!o l 218
n r y, �� � y, 1 ny n� � � r l l y u ). t - � � " . 219
I' / �2 - 6- vr o 1 e of l�pp s y 0 c �� 0~ unt n n .,.� tt � �� f n� � n h1 �� 1 .� 5'1. # 221
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JERRY OCIER(CTA Case No. EB 491)
- SMI-ED PHILIPPINES TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6532)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MCKINSEY & CO. (PHILS)(CTA Case No. EB 2809)
- METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6765)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GRAND PLAZA HOTEL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 786)
- REGUS SERVICE CENTRE, PHILIPPINES B.V. - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 3161)
- MIRANT (NAVOTAS II) CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 754)
- AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6190)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。