RR No. 06-2000 — Prescribes the regulations to implement the compromise settlement of internal revenue tax liabilities of taxpayers with outstanding receivable accounts and disputed assessments with the Bureau Digest
REVENUE REGULATIONS NO. 6-2000 issued September 25, 2000 prescribes the regulations to implement the compromise settlement of internal revenue tax liabilities of taxpayers with outstanding receivable accounts and disputed assessments. Cases which may be the subject of compromise settlement are the following: 1) delinquent accounts; 2) cases under administrative protest pending in the Regional Offices, Revenue District Offices, Legal Service, Large Taxpayers Service (LTS), Enforcement Service, Excise Taxpayers Service (ETS) and Collection Service; 3) civil tax cases being disputed before the courts; 4) collection cases filed in courts; and 5) criminal violations, other than those already filed in court, or those involving criminal tax fraud. Cases that cannot be compromised are: 1) withholding tax cases; 2) criminal tax fraud cases; 3) criminal violations already filed in court; and 4) delinquent accounts with duly approved schedule of installment payments. The basis for the acceptance of compromise settlement are: 1) doubtful validity of the assessment; and 2) financial incapacity. The prescribed minimum rates for the compromise settlement of tax liabilities, reckoned on a per tax type assessment basis, are: a) 40% in cases of doubtful validity; b) 10% in cases of financial incapacity; and c) 50% in cases of delinquent accounts and disputed assessments of taxpayers registered under the LTS and ETS. Applications for the compromise settlement of tax liabilities will be evaluated and approved/disapproved by the: a) National Evaluation Board (for basic assessed tax exceeding P 1 Million and for offers less than the prescribed minimum rates); b) Regional Evaluation Board (for basic assessed tax of P 500,000.00 or less); and 3) Commissioner of Internal Revenue (for basic assessed tax exceeding P 500,000.00 but not over P1 Million).
同类文件 Revenue Regulations
- RR No. 13-99 — Prescribes the regulations for the exemption of a citizen or a resident alien individual from Capital Gains Tax on the sale, exchange or disposition of his principal residence Digest(RR No. 13-99)
- RR No. 18-2025 — Amending Pertinent Provisions of Revenue Regulations No. 25-2003, as Amended, to Implement Section 149 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as Further Amended Under Section 18 of Republic Act No. 12214, Otherwise Known as the "Capital Markets Efficiency Promotion Act" (Date Posted: August 5, 2025)(RR No. 18-2025)
- RR No. 27-2020 — Suspends the filing and 90-day processing of Value-Added Tax (VAT) Refund claims anchored under Section 112 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, in relation to Section 4(tt) of RA No. 11494 (Bayanihan to Recover as One Act) (Published in Malaya Business Insight on October 8, 2020) Digest | Full Text(RR No. 27-2020)
- RR No. 11-2015 — Amends Sections 2 and 7(6) of Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 7-2010, as amended by RR No. 8-2010 (Published in Manila Bulletin on October 1, 2015) Digest | Full Text(RR No. 11-2015)
- RR No. 6-2023 — Amends certain provisions of RR No. 13-2010 regarding Late/Out-of-District filing of Tax Returns (Published in Manila Bulletin on June 16, 2023)(RR No. 6-2023)
- RR No. 10-2020 — Amends Section 2 of RR No. 7-2020 relative to the extension of statutory deadlines and timelines for the filing and submission of any document and the payment of taxes pursuant to Section 4 (z) of RA No. 11469 (Bayanihan to Heal as One Act) (Published in Manila Bulletin on April 15, 2020)(RR No. 10-2020)
- RR No. 03-2001 — Grants moratorium on the withholding of Income Tax on the compensation income of public elementary and secondary school teachers employed by the national government Digest | Full Text(RR No. 03-2001)
- RR No. 19-2003 — Defers the implementation of the amendatory provisions introduced by RR No. 4-2003 until September 8, 2003 (published in Philippine Star on June 11, 2003) Digest | Full Text(RR No. 19-2003)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。