CTA Case No. 1751 (Decision)
11, rr: r rL � Pllll.ll'l' ( <1l I' <ll�� '1.\X t l'l'E.\Lti QUI�.Z.O ' Cl'l Y � � 7 � t t I 1 301 3I
17 1 2. 00 2 30 �� 0 1 i o"" G�.t.l c t 0 I) Cl c nvoie ' no� tl to ..-:v "' l"dt:! l .. S'l" ~J"" . al t< >,) 0 o�.� � " or t't.d i .to.cr.:nn L 1r.. ", r 1 - l 9 0 1 ~"o, 302
; 17!11 TOTAL Jt. 1 1, TOT; I, AliOFlJ"T DU.t!i 303
-1 t "I ... ' c l' l
5 ' 305
eo; I! t one ' , to t ,; o.oo 15 1957 1 CY t l. a D � tto m. c o ~t �h p ti ionc. un dt:Jclu:r~d 1,.s :s l s. t the 1 , s 1 , ,, 1956, 19!11 n.d 1958 try !~eJ.li ty 14'511U1a �;; rs� nd:tn�� ic ~~ tor the .al 0 s. o.t: i" th ll r 1d n t ! lud c g OiOIS a1 of P~V nw:te: a~nw 1 S) 306
tJ �~~ r~�~ I (.~r.I - '-;':J: r G, ,; !';, i !(} t' 1'751 I t .. t lo '-.' ,_ '; 307
~ �:t,-.ru .. 'r ~ ~ot- , No. t7;11 a \95 Ouo lludn Mt:. 1t -~n ine 0 .tiC � ~ ~o� , du ..- t l t � o. r, art .. cen.si .tr ; + t -n 1 r. in . tori 'lU 7, '~���~~ioollloo.!~ 5 1 . l t l. >) nthly in ar st fl."' ''"'t ?() 19!iJ t �~ � 7, om ta .a.u 3 -0 8
� rt t � t-11 . l t 1nc u ~r 0. � r ....- Y 1 309 J,C:''
� 1751 .. 0",, �;;,. . ( J... �. . ...J:.,f�}~":�. ~{''/ ~ I ... n �p ble 1 ~,\,.,..o..;..j.'l..' ~. � .f /};~ .:\) :;-1 rJ._ 4 ... :.>-.)-C i-. te .. t:(,1 s~ 310 3-/(.)
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 1029)
- CTA Case No. 2220 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2220)
- CEBU MABUHAY PAWNSHOP, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 20)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL)(CTA Case No. EB 246)
- CTA Case No. 2208 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2208)
- MIRANT NAVOTAS CORPORATION (FORMERLY: SOUTHERN ENERGY NAVOTAS, INC.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6960)
- CTA Case No. 2094 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2094)
- TOYOTA MOTOR PHILIPPINES CORPORATION V. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 9250)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。