[ G. R. No. 37353. May 03, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37353. May 03, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37353
[ G. R. No. 37353. May 03, 1934 ]
CONSOLACION VERCELUZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. MIGUEL PELEJO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tayabas________, dated the __________5th__________ day of __________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , set aside and it is declared that the land in question is the property of the plaintiff and appellant, without any pronouncement as to damages, the plaintiff not having presented proof to support the allegation that he suffered damages amounting to P50.00. Costs shall be taxed in both instances against the appellee.
It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__82.00________, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. NO. 154064. February 28, 2005 ](492 Phil. 605)
- [ G.R. No. 166510. April 29, 2009 ](605 Phil. 194)
- G.R. No. 182573, April 23, 2014
- [ G.R. No. L-20876. July 30, 1965 ]
- [ G.R. No. 66069. September 28, 1984 ](217 Phil. 374)
- [ G.R. No. 139411. August 09, 2001 ](414 Phil. 793)
- A.M. No. RTJ-00-1602, December 05, 2000
- G.R. No. 174771, September 11, 2007
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。