[ G. R. No. 41003. August 18, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41003. August 18, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41003
[ G. R. No. 41003. August 18, 1934 ]
MARIA DE MORETA AND PAULINO M. SAMPEDRO, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. THE MUNICIPALITY OF LAS PIÑAS, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________2nd________day of ________August________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Rizal_________, dated the _________6th__________ day of __________September_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________recover from __________the appellant__________the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. 145-CFI. June 11, 1975 ](159-A Phil. 560; 71 OG 7145 (October 22, 1975))
- [ G.R. No. L-39373. September 30, 1974 ](158 Phil. 368; 71 OG 1257 (March, 1975))
- [ G.R. No. 173308. June 25, 2008 ](578 Phil. 314)
- A.C. No. 8243, July 24, 2009
- [ G.R. No. 161431. October 13, 2010 ](647 Phil. 350)
- [ A.M. No. P-98-1276. September 25, 1998 ](357 Phil. 79)
- [ G. R. No. 47456. April 08, 1941 ]
- [ G.R. No. 222637. April 20, 2022 ](922 Phil. 588; 121 OG No. 7, 1575 (February 17, 2025))
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。