CTA Case No. 3472 (Resolution)
$
COURT.OF TAX APPEALS REPUBLIC OF THE QUEZON CITY PHILIPPINES
GENERAL INBURAHCE PUE PHINXRRINS AMSRICAN CONPANY Fetitionerc
versus E CaTobe CASE NO 347
THR RON IHTIRAAL ERVENUT COHNISSIONLR zospondent. O
1
RGBOLUTIO
It urpearing that petitioner is no ionger interested
in puruing its appeal to thim Court as indicated in the
anifestation And otion rilod on Nay 3, i98 on the
ground that the deticiency preaium, fixed and contractors
taxas in the aunt of l8a.34t.70 ought to be eollectod
herein havealready begn aettled threwgh oompeonine ander
the oparatioa Linis Projran ot tha sureno gf Lnternal
Beveaue with petitioner Paying the anount ot 65,923.00
under Contral Dank Contirnation Reooipt Nc. a 404o029
datea April 25, 19g,and there belng no objeotion on
the part of respondat, the said aotion is hereby asanrna
hecorcingly, let the setition for zeview he duaned
withdrawn and the above-entitled case coneiered Cl080
a00 terminared.
SO URDERS
queaon city+ Motco uanila Hay 3l, i904.
Qurarb Presiuing ASAV AI*t* Judge C
hssociace 0 BE J SE CO CTE Aasocirce aeey Juage MORUTN
121
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- DANILO G. GALANG, doing business under the name and style of ST. HILDEGARD GRAINS ENTERPRISES, and IVY M. SOUZA, doing business under the name and style of BOLD BIDDER MARKETING AND GENERAL MERCHANDISE v. THE BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 8885)
- TRIDHARMA MARKETING CORP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9155)
- CTA Case No. 6991 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 6991)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. THE HONGKONG SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED - PHILIPPINE BRANCH(CTA Case No. EB 1257)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JUANCHITO D. BERNARDO, PRAXEDES P. BERNARDO AND JDBEC, INCORPORATED (consol with O-730, O-732 & O-734)(CTA Case No. O-728)
- AIG SHARED SERVICES CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9879)
- DMCI MASBATE POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10424)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SKY CABLE CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2305)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。