[ G. R. No. 41218. August 03, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41218. August 03, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41218
[ G. R. No. 41218. August 03, 1934 ]
P. D. CARMAN CO., LTD., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS.LUZ LOPEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________18th__________ day of __________November_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, modified and judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of of P3,112.75 with respect thereon at the rate of 12 % per annum from September 14, 1933, until said sum is fully paid, with costs in both instances against the defendant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff__________ recover from __________the defendant__________ the sum of P__101.00__, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- G.R. NO. 166984, August 07, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 190408. July 20, 2016 ](790 Phil. 631)
- [ G.R. No. L-64967. September 23, 1985 ](223 Phil. 198)
- G.R. No. 221874, July 07, 2020
- G.R. NO. 148004, January 22, 2007
- [ G.R. No. L-43257. January 20, 1977 ](166 Phil. 34; 73 OG 10221 (October, 1977))
- [ G.R. No. 220741. August 14, 2019 ](859 Phil. 440)
- G.R. No. 200608, February 10, 2021
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。