[ G. R. No. 39768. July 13, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39768. July 13, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39768
[ G. R. No. 39768. July 13, 1934 ]
EUGENIO TESTA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. MAXIMO DE VERA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bulacan________, dated the __________12th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the case is remanded for further proceedings in comformity with said decision, without special pronouncement of costs.
It is further ordered that __________xx___________xx___________xx___________ recover from ___________xx___________xx___________xx___________the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 177656, December 10, 2008
- [ G.R. Nos. 9169 and 9170. March 14, 1914 ](G.R. Nos. 9169)
- [ G.R. No. L-58284. November 19, 1981 ](196 Phil. 41; 83 OG No. 19, 2293 (May 11, 1987))
- [ A.C. No. 7649. December 14, 2011 ](678 Phil. 588)
- G.R. No. 130742, July 18, 2000
- [ G. R. No. 45346. January 30, 1937 ]
- [ G.R. No. 135012. September 07, 2004 ](481 Phil. 162)
- [ G.R. No. 131085. June 19, 2000 ](389 Phil. 308)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。