[ G. R. No. 39719. June 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39719. June 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39719
[ G. R. No. 39719. June 02, 1934 ]
VICENTE FORMOSO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. W. S. STACY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Cagayan__________, dated the__________21st______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of this instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellee__________ recover from __________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. 45537. July 30, 1937 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-5199. October 29, 1953 ]
- [ G.R. No. 109036. July 05, 1995 ](315 Phil. 657)
- [ G.R. Nos. 201044 & 222691. May 05, 2021 ](902 Phil. 54)
- [ G.R. No. 9494. January 07, 1915 ](G.R. No. 9494)
- [ G.R. No. 175795. June 22, 2015 ](761 Phil. 64)
- [ Adm. Case No. 629. November 29, 1973 ](153 Phil. 390)
- [ G.R. No. L-17884. November 29, 1965 ]
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。