CTA Case No. 2000 (Decision)
\l'l"lJtlLIC OF THE PHILlPPl.Nl~ CO URT 01 TAX APPEALI QUEZON CITI' .... ��� . . .. �' �"" t.. �T .Ri 1;. - ... d � ' '' . 3 3 5 -- ; \
. " - .... � -- p ;:'.\ i� f � .. t� . ; ~) r.r~� i 'ltt i ~.Y 'W ~� t. j ,p t� of tb 0t � tic i .. �"' Ot:� l" ' 1 of 1l C<C~ e .. ' .336
�- _. ot t � .. .,., .". � � � j n .� ._pril.- 1, l~l t t. 4 ' -r d th re. r, ' r .. en~ Q" 1 1ur.. �> hi c l i -I � t l- 1 1 \ll � + �* e .t" r~ t. J.:t 0 .. h itn. &~,ttl t -c !,. ,1nc to it 0 n- ' 1~ - 1 ... t � t.Ul-J.., .t' .. t � .l!lUI(If 0 ._, } 3 3 7 - .. ' -- ? ,._~) f t 'I ' d Li_ )
- ti� i .. ' I. - tho p <l . \a �, � i nter rn b. 0 1 ..1o �r .,r. it �,(hill . ... , t .1:�+ooc.G "' '. he ld �Ol' it GiVJ. �~ .,l ,. ll .- . � (;> !~ l:' .l. <i;l: l p.~ 0 .1 ~~t..n � -�1 ( .Ct. 1 nor c 1.;. � 1e n t. QSI ~ 3 3 81
� ... - � ... �� � � � n ... l l� � - r J c � u .- ' t .~ 3-�3'9 . jC or ruling
� l. - - 30
;~1 - ~J HJ . .. I - l p� � t. t l1 o' tn f, r~ .u "' cp (; ' ro r ; au . �9 tc;.:.;x .;,.. ) 9 . 0 � t I. 1 "" ' ..t' � n � �
- - .... .' � 0 "'�� . \
� ,\ .. .' 34;3
� -- I � I' , � � ... 344
- -l .. � l.o --:1 ' t ' ~ t .. ..; � 1 � 1� .. .� l � �� � if . '. t J. r. .1 . .� ' ', ) ~ c. � .' � ' '
- ... � �.A..� vi . /I. Q I) .. � �
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE consolidated with CTA CASE NOS. 8546 & 8595(CTA Case No. 8510)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NOKIA (PHILIPPINES), INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1227)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ARNEL CORTEZ MANALOTO, 64B Sto. Entierro Street, Sto. Cristo, Angeles City, Pampanga (consolidated with CTA Crim. Case Nos. O-455, O-456 & O-457)(CTA Case No. O-454)
- CTA Case No. 2828 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2828)
- CTA Case No. 1628 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1628)
- SPC REALTY CORPORATION v. MUNICIPAL TREASURER OF CAINTA(CTA Case No. EB 985)
- CTA Case No. 3221 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3221)
- CTA Case No. 3697 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3697)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。