[ G.R. No. 5768. December 20, 1909 ]
[ G.R. No. 5768. December 20, 1909 ]
G.R. No. 5768
[ G.R. No. 5768. December 20, 1909 ]
PEDRO A. ENRIQUEZ, PETITIONER, VS. J.S. POWELL, JUDGE OF FIRST INSTANCE FOR THE SEVENT JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AND EMILIO CAMPOMANES, RESPONDENTS.
D E C I S I O N
Petitioner applied for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent judge to take cognizance of a protest against the election of a municipal president. The judge refused to proceed with the protest because it had been filed with the clerk of the court while the judge was holding sessions in another province from which he returned after he expiration of the two weeks fixed by the Election Law for the presentation of protests, and upon the ground that the law does not confer power upon the clerk to receive and file such protests. It is held, however, that the protest was presented in accordance with section 27 of Act No. 1582, and that it was the respondent's duty to take cognizance thereof. Writ granted. Per Johnson, J.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 110107. January 26, 1995 ](310 Phil. 694)
- G.R. NO. 167979, March 16, 2006
- G.R. No. 183843, January 19, 2011
- G.R. NO. 144638, August 09, 2005
- [ G.R. No. L-26476. August 31, 1970 ](145 Phil. 467)
- G.R. No. 215933, February 08, 2017
- [ G.R. No. 6906. September 27, 1911 ](G.R. No. 6906)
- [ G.R. No. 213617. April 18, 2018 ](830 Phil. 269)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。