CTA Case No. 1624 (Decision)
~EPUIU.IC 0., T E HIUPPINEI!I 00UP...T TAX APPEA..L8 QUEZON CITY ItS ......u ........J..:�.U em L y' etitioner, - versus - C. i � � C ( Jo . l 2 ~~ -- -<f1"''1 espon nt. x.. - - ... - - DEC I ~ I Thi ea e involves a el 1 � for r f~n of the a ou t of � 19,921 . 37 ra s ting 25 o th s elf e a d o amif etu. d 1 o l an otor fu 1 u.ti liz by p titioner in th~ op r tion of it fo t eonoeos on in the y r 1963. titioner, orporatlo org iz nd e ti. u r t e so ork, - . ~�� , and uly uthor- z d to do in t e Phili pine~ , is a for st cone re an' 1 e n oper to of (par � 1- 2, p ition or r v ; .. spon en' ' m o . , P. 17j ' T v . � ... l. r c. ) . In tho y ar 9 3, p-titio r ure as d anufac- turad oil a d otor f uel wh c t used in �he o e tion of its or co c sion, W ill, pl Oihq ill , po er unit~ , vehicles , dry k lns, wat p p , a n mo�.v r ... , n in fur L,hing fr wa n light to 1 ploy es , on 1ich sp cific ta wa pai � In a lett r atea oca r 22 , 196t , . t on 236
0l nu.p t r ..>..l.., ..'. . �.. r e . ) r- .xn. . ' � ent ~tl. c:t. .. i �o Ull p 11 2i, ' p!:.'lt t ! .1. o.r ~n ~- t t' , r r �t ~1 Jur-. � ' totton ch l :1 tt ' 1 t .� . t 0 ro n � j ls- ctt r S �~ O n 1' ls1o c ~�t1 ion r 0 'J. 9~J, p ti lo 'o l' :fil� d n i �tit t 1 ">*' l9o5, t.l no b 1 tb. hl.rty- .� p-:rl~ } 0 t~j 1. � o � cor e t10B a r 1tor1o .,. .1 1 1 t &p on ... r vi ~37
3 'C1 io 0. t ~ ,, br:� .y:y ll. ; 19... !1 a 1: OE.i'V.,. � p ti- io 1 t.. tit n- ~ tt in su Ot Q tis t t s1o z. $ J, �1 , l 6 ... ... et tl r ~eGi oo� � 1 b, t\l'! 'tl 1fL to . i' r . Jo -n~~o -n 1 i nic te 0 s by B no ; �. re on t � it"' to e l �.~ tion n .1 i .r� d .t l E?r tl. a el r1o�~l e ror�. � a 111 �t ... , Ul. h 1 .. t1 011' ... tioa � � It 1 th o. ,.-~ ) con 1 ll ged ~ now to . on th M. ne i Q( t �lti 1 0 tt- (1) hat p ie ' tic r a 1 cal nc l t .. ; tl � c ox� su Q,Ql on~ j ot; ( a,.t~ btt t '..'" p.t"i ila .)t l to or in ' ,at1 n 'r,)� 1.;:-p 1c ct. � l' t i t �~!1 to e to r 5) t e tL 0 c t to t, ( ' on 10tl>ll!.t' n 19 .h ... ., i \"1. no � o~ nr\o ' 956, th r :1,... ut it'd r; (3) t 238
tic on t b t( ) 1 or t ./!: . ntt .f! portloo t t G: mitt ra: otl n tor I 1t~ 0 1 t1on � :t-1 bt I u - pr � e $1 n t (!.., t i t tion 11 to t h� no tj . t � o nf n r ft ��ttion � . or rev! a~. for tb l or nt. ; t 1n . . ct 1� vlol ton t ,r 111 , ... ot:ton 21, o! ..., e Oon:} t1t tion. t r nd ny necn �ru1 y ... t. h _ot tt"lcn f*c t .,. u 1 o . to. 143' t:s; not tl v1 .tt.an t em t\l<J n r � ��~ 1 ~ pre r Ow 1" r" \ng S.$ . -.... 11 X, .. oil n ~u l ,., of .,;,.,;; 't l u ct 0 e Ac �a. 14 5, .1 " tt g id e m a:ro ' ' w . *1 . t In ai tl .r his curt, 239 ~--
� c b l'(' ob to .u y rito 0 z. -9, ' � l to J nn' 0 ci- rc r pc �� � c r4 �o ... . 0 240
bl ro tn.~ ~ on t or th p trol pt'O � a�t -_rc ln p.gt t10fl r � ... 0 ~1 op r t 0 . ~ fln/ 1 cont�nttoa e 0 d w.1th S ct1on 5 or rtepllblia Ao t�;o. +3 "~ Jd 1>' ' 2~ o.r 'dl1f1 t id 1 1 fOl'f"S: COI.'Ul �$!Si.on~.t1t 1r G,P :t 1o In ot �r ri~ t r t.A.e t X $.: on 1 h lo i 0 er� tio atlt 1 i:P$5 1.& r~fund lEt. r.;n thor- 1 0 . X� 1 rt 0 11 \!A, m tton }r ovt on, ' .x�� t of Sit o .. ep tio ot r OOll l~ n t :r ti or c. her no-lo t.iv �t1� . . ) co d out 0 th l~, 1.37' r - pro llt 25P t b e 1 1c �, onl t amo at or~ . ~ , 59 .�co � �s p 1 on oil utili . 1� 1 ~ l."l cp r~ tio a. La�t f t .~ 1 . p 1 0( t; n at ra l h d l ad
lClal'OI .... "'� A Oti)! ..� ., 1~6 . l t Hl on oil nt Con qu.ent'l � tb � r; u eb 1 to the pe i- t1on r 1� l~t' 0. f'ol OW1U .~ � �� � ~� � ���� �� *~� 242
~t I CI O - c fo.) 1' � 6;: � .. It � � � � � ... ...-. .... . ,. . ... l, . . . .. . .... . . . . ~�� 25t Tnp"' ea1t1c t xr � . . ,. r r. .��....... ."..."' �ax r �-� .......... ... ~ .. .....s, 1� � t J(; re- in s- .... .. � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � � � � ' ,. 243
� t '. 244
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 2776 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2776)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LINDE PHILIPPINES, INC. (formerly, CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIAL GASES, INC.)(CTA Case No. EB 1515)
- NATIONAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11156)
- PAMPANGA III ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND REGIONAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH M. CATAPIA, in his capacityas the REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REVENUE REGION NO. 4, CITY OF SAN FERNANDO PAMPANGA OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10911)
- LEONORA F. PASCUAL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6224)
- PETRON CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with CTA CASE NOS. 10120 & 10205)(CTA Case No. 10073)
- CTA Case No. 6065 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6065)
- CTA Case No. 4786 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4786)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。