SC Decisions G.R. No. 1128G.R. No. 1128 1903-04-29
[ G.R. No. 1128. April 29, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1128. April 29, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1128. April 29, 1903 ]
CHIYE MAGATINGE, PETITIONER, VS. LA ELECTRICISTA, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
LADD, J.:
The defendant demurred to the complaint, and while the demurrer was still pending filed an answer. These two pleadings can not stand together. The effect of the filing of the answer was to supersede the demurrer. The motion to strike out the demurrer should be granted. So ordered.
Arellano, C. J,, Torres, Cooper, Willard, and Mapa, JJ., concur.
McDonough, J., did not sit in this case.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 127227, February 28, 2001
- A.C. No. 6664, July 16, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 187836. March 10, 2015 ](755 Phil. 323; 111 OG No. 25, 3454 (June 22, 2015))
- [ G.R. No. 193677. September 06, 2011 ](672 Phil. 419)
- G.R. No. 128363, May 27, 2004
- G.R. No. 141809, April 08, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 92706. May 21, 1992 ](284-A Phil. 630)
- [ G.R. No. L-20086. July 10, 1967 ]
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。