[ G. R. No. 39756. May 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39756. May 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39756
[ G. R. No. 39756. May 11, 1934 ]
TOMAS ROSALES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. TAGUISA PLANTATION CO., INC., DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cotabato________, dated the __________20th__________ day of __________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the modification that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the sum of P25.00 monthly from October 17, 1926, until the date of the return of the vessel, with the costs of this instance against the defendant-appellee.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellant___________ recover from ___________the defendant-appellee_________ the sum of P__64.00__, as costs
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 189827. October 16, 2013 ](719 Phil. 526)
- G.R. No. 172346, July 24, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 184088. July 06, 2010 ](638 Phil. 220)
- G.R. No. 200529, September 19, 2012
- [ G.R. No. L-26244. October 31, 1969 ](140 Phil. 565)
- [ G.R. No. 176448. July 28, 2008 ](582 Phil. 346)
- [ G.R. No. L-4797. November 26, 1952 ]
- G.R. No. 227550, August 14, 2019
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。