[ G.R. No. L-3687. July 22, 1952 ]
[ G.R. No. L-3687. July 22, 1952 ]
G.R. No. L-3687
[ G.R. No. L-3687. July 22, 1952 ]
ESPERANZA P. DE HARDEN, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. FRED N. HARDEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
Motion of Attorney Claro M. Recto to establish a charging lien for professional fees on the properties involved in the case.
Case is remanded to the court of origin to determine the amount of fees claimed by Attorney Claro M. Recto in his motion. It is understood that, after said fees had been finally determined and paid, this case will be completely dismissed as prayed for by the defendants-appellants, without prejudice to considering the claim of the receiver for compensation as stated in his urgent motion.
Pending determination of the amount of fees claimed by Attorney Recto, the writ of preliminary injunction, the orders of contempt and commitment, and all interlocutory orders which were issued in the course of this case are lifted and vacated, and with regard to the receivership, the same is dissolved, only with respect to the 368,553 shares of the Balatoc Mining Company. As to the rest of properties, the receivership shall be maintained.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-16-2454. June 06, 2018 ](832 Phil. 151)
- [ G.R. No. 107131. March 13, 1997 ](336 Phil. 466)
- G.R. No. 140825, October 13, 2000
- [ G.R. No. 52242. November 17, 1980 ](189 Phil. 143; 78 OG No. 32, 4107 (August 9, 1982))
- [ G.R. No. 170477. August 07, 2007 ](556 Phil. 155)
- [ G.R. No. L-43220. October 28, 1980 ](188 Phil. 477; 83 OG No. 8, 675 (February 23, 1987))
- [ G.R. No. 12403. June 30, 1960 ](G.R. No. 12403)
- [ G.R. No. L-30854. November 19, 1982 ](204 Phil. 21; 82 OG No. 11, 1413 (March 17, 1986))
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。