CTA Case No. 2860 (Resolution)
MARIAN CLl lCS , I c., C . T . A. C S o. 2860 Petiti ner, - v rsus - E COM 1lSS10 B OF INTE NAL EV NUE, Respondent. e .2 o L u r 1 o Acting on h " 1 1 n To '1thdr w P tition For i...eview" fil d by pet 1tioner n B� reo 23,. 1907 on the ground th t the defici.ency w1thhold1nc;; tax ass s .rnent involved rein h lra y e h subj 0 comprorn ae ttle nt twe th p rti a purs nt to .x cutive rder �o. 4 , with h p ym nt by pe ition r of t t of 14, 538.00, and there bein9 no o j ction on tne p rt of respondent, �rh co r r solves, s pra d for, t o qr n.t said moti n. L t the tition for revi w be considered withdrawn nd this c e med cl ed nd terminat d. so o. ~u z n City, Me r � nila, M rch 27 , 1987. 87
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- MAKATI CITY AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY TREASURER v. ALLONS HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2146)
- FORTUNE CEMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6823)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-40 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-40)
- CTA Case No. 3778 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3778)
- CTA Case No. 811 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 811)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-61 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-61)
- ROSEMARIE G. CLEMENTE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, as represented by the Honorable Commissioner of Customs(CTA Case No. EB 2288)
- CTA Case No. 3030 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3030)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。