[ G. R. No. 40386. March 29, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40386. March 29, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40386
[ G. R. No. 40386. March 29, 1934 ]
JULIA VDA . DE CASANOVAS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT VS. ANICETO DE LA CUEVA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________12th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Laguna________, dated the __________31st__________ day of __________August____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, set aside and it is ordered that a trial beheld so that this case be decided on the merits, without costs.
It is further ordered that the said cause be remanded to the Court of First Instance.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-150. April 30, 1949 ]
- [ G.R. No. 94470. December 16, 1992 ](290-A Phil. 422)
- [ G.R. No. L-6608. December 29, 1954 ]
- [ G.R. No. 239756. September 14, 2020 ](883 Phil. 487)
- A.C. No. 14378 (Formerly CBD Case No. 23-6847), April 02, 2025
- [ G.R. No. 144458. July 14, 2004 ](478 Phil. 528)
- [ G.R. No. 188269*. April 17, 2017 ](808 Phil. 635)
- [ G.R. No. 164436. January 15, 2010 ](624 Phil. 108)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。