[ G.R. No. 5004. November 19, 1909 ]
[ G.R. No. 5004. November 19, 1909 ]
[ G.R. No. 5004. November 19, 1909 ]
THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ANDRES LUNA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
THEFT; SUFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION; PENALTY.— From the Court of First Instance of Batangas. Powell, J.
Defendant convicted of theft of cattle valued at P400,and sentenced to two years of prision correccional with accessories, article 518, paragrap 2, Penal Code. Defendant's contention that he should be convicted merely of attempted theft held to be without merit, inasmuch as he took actual possession of the cattle and drove them away. Objection to the sufficiency of the information overruled, following U.S. vs.. Sarabia (4 Phil. Rep., 566). approved in Serra vs.. Mortiga (11 Phil. Rep., 762; 204 U.S., 470). Evidence held to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and, considering the presence of nocturnity, defendant finally sentenced to three years of presidio correccional, with accessories.
Per Elliott, J. For appellant: Thos. D. Aitken. For appellee: Attorney-General Villamor.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 133886. September 05, 2001 ](416 Phil. 902)
- [ G.R. No. 243891. May 07, 2021 ](902 Phil. 180)
- [ G.R. No. L-4545. October 29, 1952 ]
- [ G.R. No. 187930. February 23, 2015 ](754 Phil. 462)
- [ G.R. No. 260013 [Formerly UDK 17349]. August 13, 2024 ](958 Phil. 164)
- G.R. No. 233839, December 02, 2021
- [ A.C. No. 1236. July 31, 1975 ](160 Phil. 573; 72 OG 3838 (April 12, 1976))
- [ G.R. No. 198404. October 14, 2019 ](865 Phil. 21; 117 OG No. 5, 933 (February 1, 2021))
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。