[ G. R. No. 39683. June 01, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39683. June 01, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39683
[ G. R. No. 39683. June 01, 1934 ]
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES (FORMERLY MACLEOD & CO.), PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. FRANCISCA RAENA VDA. DE VILLANUEAVA, ETC., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________15th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Manila__________, dated the__________22nd______________ day of __________November_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in both instances against the plaintiff-appellee.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellant__________ recover from _____________the appellee__________ the sum of P__99.00__, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 116801. April 06, 1995 ](313 Phil. 358)
- G.R. No. 155206, October 28, 2003
- G.R. NO. 148196, September 30, 2005
- [ G.R. No. L-20108. December 28, 1964 ]
- [ G.R. No. 192737. April 25, 2012 ](686 Phil. 1139)
- [ G.R. No. 3356. October 21, 1908 ](G.R. No. 3356)
- G.R. Nos. 97652-53, October 19, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 213400. August 04, 2021 ](909 Phil. 567; 120 OG No. 17, 3647 (April 22, 2024))
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。