[ G. R. No. 39510. July 07, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39510. July 07, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39510
[ G. R. No. 39510. July 07, 1934 ]
TOMAS MATIENZO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. GUADALUPE SAN JOSE ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Laguna________, dated the __________2nd__________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the defendants are absolved from the complaint. Costs in this instance against the appellee.
It is further ordered that __________the appellants _________ from the __________the appellees _________ the sum of P__79.00__, as costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 102692. September 23, 1996 ](330 Phil. 856)
- [ G.R. No. 175945 [Formerly G.R. Nos. 153211-12]. April 07, 2009 ](602 Phil. 917)
- [ G.R. No. 11328. January 15, 1918 ](G.R. No. 11328)
- [ G.R. NO. 147525. February 26, 2007 ](545 Phil. 535)
- G.R. No. 143377, February 20, 2001
- [ G.R. No. L-28607. May 31, 1971 ](148-A Phil. 229)
- [ A.M. No. P-238. September 30, 1977 ](169 Phil. 156)
- [ G.R. No. L-18816. December 29, 1962 ]
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。