[ G.R. No. L-17163. September 26, 1962 ]
[ G.R. No. L-17163. September 26, 1962 ]
G.R. No. L-17163
[ G.R. No. L-17163. September 26, 1962 ]
THE PEOPLE OP THE PHILIPPINES VS. GERARDO DUMLAO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, GERARDO DUMLAO, DIEGO FAMULA-REANO AND FROILAN TABUNDAY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
Appeal from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Zambales,
SUMMARY
This is an appeal from a decision convicting the accused-appellants of the crime of murder and sentencing them to life imprisonment and to imdemnify the heirs of the victim jointly and severally. The testimony of the victim's son positively identified the herein appellants as the perpetrators of the crime which was partly corroborated by one Egmidio Basa, who had assisted in burying the body of the victim. The appellants denied having committed the crime and each-except one-set up the defense of alibi. The lower court accepted the version of the prosecution and found the evidence for the defense unworthy of credence. Decision appealed from is affirmed.
RULING
The Supreme Court find no plausible reason to disturb the findings of fact of the lower court. In an affidavit made before the Justice of the Peace of Botolan, Zambales, Juan Famulareano admitted that neither he nor Froilan Tabunday had gone to the sitio of Camao, on March 24, 1943, contrary to their testimony in this case. In said affidavit, Juan Famulareano also allegedly learned from his brother Diego that Engracio Doble had been shot by Gerardo Dumlao, who confirmed this fact. Also, Diego Famulareano admitted that he could not explain why Bendito Doble had implicated him.
Regarding the motive in committing the crime, it appears that the victim Engracio Doble, as second officer in command of the Western Luzon Guerilla Force—was suspected—as responsible for1, or instrumental in, the execution by the guerillas of certain cousins of the appellants, suspected as spies of the Japanese and that said victim had turned down the request of one of the accused that his cousin Eulogia Dumlao, be burried in the barrio cemetery instead of the place where she died, as well as a request that he be transferred from a given guerilla sector to another.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 201595, January 25, 2016
- [ A.M. No. MTJ-00-1276. June 23, 2000 ](389 Phil. 580)
- [ G.R. No. L-44363. March 12, 1980 ](185 Phil. 355; 76 OG No. 43, 8079 (October 27, 1980))
- [ G.R. No. 69251. September 13, 1989 ](258 Phil. 240)
- G.R. No. 182267, August 28, 2009
- A.M. No. MTJ-02-1419, December 27, 2002
- G.R. No. 150276, February 12, 2008
- [ G.R. No. 50296. February 14, 1983 ](205 Phil. 521; 80 OG 1141 (February 20, 1984))
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。