[ G.R. No. 1760. April 03, 1905 ]
[ G.R. No. 1760. April 03, 1905 ]
[ G.R. No. 1760. April 03, 1905 ]
THE UNITED STATES, COMPLAINANT AND APPELLEE, VS. IRINEO BIBAL, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
WILLARD, J.:
Upon the question of fact presented by the brief of the defendant we hold that the participation in the robbery by the defendant is proved. It is suggested, also, that the complaint presented by a private person, not haying been sworn to, was void. The provincial fiscal, on February 3, 1903, certified in writing that he found the complaint sufficient, and named three other witnesses for the prosecution. Whether this amounted to an adoption by him of the complaint, and made it an information which did not require an oath, it is not necessary to decide. The want of an oath was, in any event, a defect of form which did not affect the substantial rights of the defendant on the merits. Section 10 of General Orders, No. 58, does not permit a judgment to be set aside for such a defect.
Evidence that the defendant was the leader of the band which committed the robbery is found at folio 68.
The judgment is affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
Arellano, C. J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson, and Carson, JJ., concur.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-15141. September 19, 1961 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-12798. May 30, 1960 ]
- G.R. No. 140001, June 27, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 72876. January 18, 1991 ](271 Phil. 17)
- [ G.R. No. 170180. November 23, 2007 ](563 Phil. 934)
- [ G.R. No. L-20491. August 31, 1965 ]
- [ G.R. No. 188571. October 10, 2012 ](697 Phil. 171)
- G.R. No. 119325, September 26, 1996
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。