CTA Case No. 386 (Decision)
~( �..' < ;,.; ~'� . . . . _ . � .t. � � vt~;n; � '"' . a~ ,v A " ' .;..;L . ... J .J1 ' ... , ... - "'e"' or ant.. ' ..... - . . ., .. X . r: l J of : c OI.".< ~ "l' 2 t \ .'.1!I � 10 by i t Y 'I J l,/ 1 _., 1 i .. ' th' c i' 1!-: .. 0 'Ei .. i' 217
t ~' 1. "'"ij - ~I.,t:.:JW J,. ::, t . I J, ~ L'IJ . 3<.>6 3 e J � � .ro nJ an: '.� rk ru;1 er �o -:::s_ -.: l ... =ro e . f, .... ....� c~t.? :r�u;.,t;~~r to ""'.r' w,:a 3 x .:t;.n rut 1, .:.ts o~~l �r\.�l �r: . t �� '�!�!> � > � �J l'..~ ... .... A�c.l i~ i1- . ! .. 1 . ~ .. , ~. ~~...-.;.;...:..;,:..;......,..;;;,.:....-.....;,4;.ii~......U lt. "' . .. - 'II
i ..... ::.. .. r .0! � 0 rutb~�,. Y t.r e ~. e t ....r ir r��t r l- c r � ~t r ny v . slot;,e�'� t. � !':! �. � c ,,,. 220
ti) :.tv~�::�t. ~; 1 .. j.,:::..a:ni of �c~:w w:itt.~=::r::.i;.h�.m ra~:; r.ot
l ... " .l. �\.h - �:1, :., ,� ' . ]86 6 su~ l i oJ.u,: .s 'or rP. l () b~ ,>t .t .u{',, " 1' r .. ,. 'r pe , ... 1 3 :�r .. r .. t to l 0� r H of th~ 1- . .Lon t 1. AX 1. L i." in . np~ "' to t b ... tr . h re. rtl nt i" ~1-' l l lJ' ..v. t' !'t nd ( l..!ol . o� Int .. � nto t .l . ' 3 ' .... .I �� 101 : .I~ . u r ... n ' rc, , j ) i i "J:rl ro of ! r v fj' r:f tl 0 rioo 1~ ., \..... rl t5 r ir. l or th .o '':".15 t C;..Ob r "6 . . r.: ;h.o !0 � 222
7 ~u 30~ �i � , uc� b r � t � ~ 75 Lt~r "i .; ~~ 2 2�3
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 6002 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6002)
- PHILAM PROPERTIES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8635)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TETRA PAK PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2816)
- NEW MOON HOLDINGS (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. THE CITY OF TAGUIG AND ATTY. J. VOLTAIRE L. ENRIQUEZ IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF TAGUIG(CTA Case No. AC-340)
- LBC EXPRESS, INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8309)
- BASES CONVERSION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 797)
- CTA Case No. 4189 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4189)
- DANILO S. LIHAYLIHAY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7515)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。