[ G.R. No. 5864. September 16, 1911 ]
[ G.R. No. 5864. September 16, 1911 ]
[ G.R. No. 5864. September 16, 1911 ]
RAMON DOMINISAG, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MANUEL MANCILLA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
MORELAND, J.:
We affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the court below, laying special emphasis upon the fact that the defendant at the time he purchased the land in question knew the rights and interests of the plaintiff in and to the said land and had before him the instrument showing such interest in the plaintiff. Having this knowledge, he can not be said to be an innocent purchaser and he accordingly took subject to the rights of the plaintiff therein. Torres, Mapa, Johnson, and Carson, JJ.,concur.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 184237, September 21, 2016
- [ G.R. No. 115216. July 05, 1996 ](327 Phil. 906)
- [ G.R. No. L-1779. June 19, 1948 ]
- [ G.R. No. 3412. January 19, 1907 ](G.R. No. 3412)
- [ G.R. Nos. 178085-86. September 14, 2015 ](769 Phil. 630)
- [ A.C. No. 12443. August 23, 2023 ](946 Phil. 301)
- G.R. No. 220030, March 18, 2019
- G.R. Nos. 138931-32, July 17, 2003
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。