[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 155-2015, July 23, 2015 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 155-2015, July 23, 2015 ]
[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 155-2015, July 23, 2015 ]
TO : JUSTICES, JUDGES, COURT OFFICIALS AND PERSONNEL OF THE THIRD, SECOND AND FIRST LEVEL COURTS
SUBJECT : AMENDMENTS TO A.M. NO. 04-7-02-SC (Re: GUIDELINES ON CORPORATE SURETY BONDS)
In accordance with the Resolution dated 21 April 2015 of the Court in A.M. No. 04-7-02-SC (Re: Guidelines on Corporate Surety Bonds), all concerned justices, judges, court officials and personnel are hereby informed of the following amendments/clarifications to the said guidelines:
(a) That the obligation on the part of the accused/defendant to pay the annual premium necessary for the renewal of the surety bond previously approved by the court REMAINS;
(b) The phrase "Unless and until the Supreme Court directs otherwise" appearing in the first paragraph of Section VII of A.M. No. 04-7-02-SC is AMENDED to read as "Unless and until the court concerned directs otherwise;" and
(c) The second paragraph of Section VII of A.M. No. 04-7-02-SC is AMENDED to include the following statement: "If the surety company seeks to be discharged from its obligation because of the failure/refusal of the accused/defendant to pay the premiums, it shall make the same notice within ten (10) days from the occurrence of such fact and the court shall decide accordingly."
This Circular supersedes prior circulars/memoranda inconsistent herewith and shall remain in force until further orders from the Court.
Strict compliance is hereby enjoined.
23 July 2015
(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Court Administrator
同类文件 Circulars
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 196-2016, September 07, 2016 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 57-2009, May 20, 2009 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 25-2007, March 05, 2007 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2004, February 13, 2004 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 125-2014, September 24, 2014 ]
- [ SC ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 43-2014, May 26, 2014 ]
- [ SC ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 19-2011, March 18, 2011 ]
- [ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 115-2004, September 21, 2004 ]
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。