[ G.R. No. L-6092. December 24, 1953 ]
[ G.R. No. L-6092. December 24, 1953 ]
G.R. No. L-6092
[ G.R. No. L-6092. December 24, 1953 ]
MANUEL BORJA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. THE CITY TREASURER AND THE MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF MANILA, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila which although upholding the validity of Manila City Ordinance No. 3379, declared that plaintiff’s buses were not subject thereto inasmuch as their situs was in Malabon.
The appealed decision exempting the appellees from payment of the tax will have to be affirmed for the obvious reason that this Court has stated in the cases of Association of Customs Brokers, Inc., and G. Manlapit Inc., vs. The Municipal Board of the City of Manila (93 Phil., 107) and Phil. Motor Assn vs. City Assessor, et al., No. L-4442, promulgated May 22, 1953, that the ordinance was null and void, "not only because it infringes Motor Vehicle Law, Act No. 3992, but also because it offends against the rule of uniformity of taxation."
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 94533. February 04, 1992 ](282 Phil. 809; 88 OG No. 39, 6202 (September 28, 1992))
- [ G.R. No. 57292. February 18, 1986 ](225 Phil. 313; 85 OG No. 10, 1986 (March 6, 1988))
- [ A.M. No. P-04-1878 (Formerly OCA-IPI-02-1462-P). August 31, 2004 ](480 Phil. 698)
- [ G.R. No. 55613. December 10, 1990 ](270 Phil. 256)
- G.R. No. 246231, January 20, 2021
- [ G.R. No. 117383. March 06, 1995 ](312 Phil. 194; 91 OG No. 39, 6289 (September 25, 1995 ))
- [ G.R. No. 234808. November 19, 2018 ](843 Phil. 488)
- [ G.R. No. 1683. April 05, 1905 ](G.R. No. 1683)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。