[ Adm. Case No. 797. May 31, 1982 ]
[ Adm. Case No. 797. May 31, 1982 ]
← click for PDF copy
SECOND DIVISION
[ Adm. Case No. 797. May 31, 1982 ]
LYDIA CABATU, COMPLAINANT, VS. EDGARDO C. DOMINGO, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
FERNANDO, C.J.:
The fitness of respondent Edgardo C. Domingo to remain a member of the Philippine Bar was assailed in this complaint for disbarment filed by Lydia Cabatu. It was alleged that notwithstanding the fact that his marriage with complainant was valid and subsisting, he contracted a second marriage with one Florecita A. Pe Aguirre on September 16, 1967. Respondent was required to answer. All he said was that he was without knowledge of such allegation. The case was then referred to the Solicitor General[1] for investigation, report, and recommendation. Such report was submitted on January 18, 1982. The case had to be set for hearing on three occasions, the first two not taking place as subpoenas for both complainant and respondent were returned unclaimed. The Report went on to state: "Despite receipt by complainant and her counsel of the order setting the case for hearing on October 13, 1981, neither one appeared. Indeed, from the time the complaint was filed in 1967 up to the present time, there has not been any move on the part of complainant to pursue her complaint. It is fairly evident that she has lost interest in prosecuting the case."[2] As for the respondent, the record disclosed that the registered letter addressed to him was received "with the notation on the envelope: 'addressee moved to USA, no forwarding address.' "[3]
The recommendation was understandably for the dismissal of the complaint for disbarment. WHEREFORE, the petition is dismissed. No costs.
Aquino, Guerrero, De Castro, and Escolin, JJ., concur. Barredo, J., votes with J. Abad Santos for provisional dismissal. Concepcion, Jr., J., on leave.
[1] Solicitor General Estelito P. Mendoza was assisted by Assistant Solicitor General Eduardo Montenegro and Solicitor Oswaldo D. Agcaoili. [2] Report, 3.
[3] Ibid.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-12-2326 (Formerly A.M. OCA I.P.I. No.11-3692-RTJ). January 30, 2013 ](702 Phil. 433)
- G.R. No. 244835, December 11, 2019
- [ G.R. No. 1261. November 21, 1905 ](G.R. No. 1261)
- [ G.R. No. 121098. September 04, 1997 ](343 Phil. 949)
- G.R. No. 165777, July 25, 2011
- [ G.R. No. 180086. July 02, 2014 ](738 Phil. 143)
- G.R. Nos. 131858-59, April 14, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 175700. July 05, 2010 ](637 Phil. 339)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。