[ G. R. No. 39663. May 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39663. May 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39663
[ G. R. No. 39663. May 11, 1934 ]
MONICO FLORES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. SOFIA FLORES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Oriental________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs against the appellants
It is further ordered that __________the appelles_________ recover from ___________the appellants____________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs
同类文件 SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-31501. June 30, 1970 ](144 Phil. 729)
- [ A.M. NO. 05-10-618-RTC. July 11, 2006 ](527 Phil. 20)
- [ G.R. No. L-22515. April 27, 1967 ]
- G.R. No. 170974, March 03, 2008
- [ G.R. No. L-20398. October 31, 1968 ](134 Phil. 872)
- G.R. No. 149569, May 28, 2004
- [ G.R. Nos. 15490-93. April 29, 1961 ](G.R. Nos. 15490-93)
- [ G.R. No. 57738. October 23, 1984 ](217 Phil. 651)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。