CTA Case No. 2286 (Resolution)
llEPU8LIC OF THE fttttur... � t.ls COURt OF TAX APPEALS QUUOM CITY ALHAMBRA INDUSTRIES, INC., COLUMBIA TOBACCO COMPANY and LA FLOR DE LA ISABELA, INCOR- PORADA, Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2286 HON. MISAEL P. VERA, in hi s capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, BATAAN CIGAR AND CIGAR- ETTE FACTORY, INC., LA PERLA INDUSTRIES, INC., PIONEER TOBACCO CORPORATION, INSULAR-YEBANA TOBACCO CORPORATION, LAS BUENAS FABRICA DE CIGARILLOS, 1NC. , LA DICHA CIGAR & CIGARE TTE FACTORY, CONSOLIDATED TOBACCO INDUSTRIES OF THE PHILIP- PINES, INC., LA CAMPANA FABRICA DE TABACOS, INC., FORTUNE TOBACC O CORPORATION, BAGUMBUHAY CIGAR AND OGARETTE FACTORY, D.L. TERUEL TOBACCO CO. , 1NC., and ASSOCIATED ANGLO- AMERICAN TOBACCO CORP., Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2303 MISAEL P. VERA, in his capacity ffi Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X ALHAMBRA INDUSTRIES, INC., COLUMBIA TOBACCO COMPANY and LA FLOR DE LA ISABELA, INCOR- PORADA, Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2413 HON. MISAEL P. VERA, in his rnpacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
_� 2 ~ LA SUER TE CIGAR & CIGARETJE FACTORY~ COLUMBIA TOBACCO CO., INC., LA DICHA LA PAZ Y ,BUEN VIAJE CIGAR & CIGARETTE FACTORY, ASSO- CIATED ANGLO-AMERICAN TOBA CCO CORPORATION, PIONEER TOBACCO CORPORATION, BAGUMBUHAY CIGAR & CIGARETTE CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED TOBACCO INDUSTRIES OF THE PHILIP- PINES, INC., INSULAR YEBANA TOBACCO CORPORATION, LA CAMPANA FABRICA DE TABAC0 S, I NC � , F0RTUNE T0BACC0 CORPORATION, LAS BUENAS FABRICA DE CIGARILLOS, INC., LA PERLA INDUSTRIES, INC., ALHAMBRA INDUSTRIES, INC., and LA FLOR DE LA ISABELA, INCORPORADA, Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2513 HON. MISAEL P. VERA, in his capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X RES 0 LUT I 0 N It appearing that petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing their appeals to this Court as indicated in the "Motion For Withdrawal And To Consider Cases Closed/Termi- nated" filed oil July 16, 19:85, .on the ground: 1. That on Febru ~ ry 8, 19B5, the under- signed counsel rec eived the decision of the Suprem e Court of the Philippines on the cases on appeal thereat of La Su erte Cigar and Cigarette Factory,� et al., versus Court of Tax Appeals and Han. Misael P. Vera and Alhambra Industries Incorporated, et al., versus Court of Tax Appeals a nd Hon. Misael P. Vera, (G.R. No. L-36130 and G.R. No. L-36131), respectively , affirming the decision of this Honorable Court, a nd 2. That ina smuch as the facts and t he law involved in G.R. No . L-36130 and G.R. No. L-36131, are iri ~ll fdurs with the facts and the law involved in the afore -numb ered cases
RESOLUTION - CTA CASES NOS. 2286, 2303, 2413 and 2513 - 3- of Alhambra Industries, et al., it is now pointless to proceed with the hearing before this Honorable Court of the afore- sai d numbered cases. and there being no objection on the part of respondent, the said motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, let the petitions for review be dis- missed and the above - entitled cases considered closed and terminated. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metro Manila, August 28, 1~85 . AMANT Presid ng Judge '-. � ROAQUIN
同类文件 CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 3924 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3924)
- SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (consolidated with case no. 7973 dtd. May 12, 2010)(CTA Case No. 7953)
- CTA Case No. 3515 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3515)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ROBINSONS CONVENIENCE STORES, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 2388)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PENN PHILIPPINES INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2512)
- CBK POWER COMPANY LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8043)
- THE CITY OF MAKATI AND THE CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI v. CEMCO HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. AC-166)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GS MTE GRAINS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1958)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。