CTA Case No. 1608 (Decision)
\J:<:PUJIII.JC OF THE PHILIPPINEI COURT OF TAX APPEAL& QUEZON CITY ��� �1 bf ! t ... "� t � tt . �
: s f\:;(~ l* --~ ,. ~ 6Cf5 C t'~. (; s~f lJC. ~ ant Mi". l; J\'Ot~ io " -QVaO. J;o f; f.). 'iindOt"t) 0~ (iQ(} trJber l3t 1 ~~3 �o ft?tO'l � � e OO!!tt. �:to findin~ b;$ o~t :S.n l�1ln- ~ -"!" t &.:.:r. .. t) ~1et.ni -nu. to &@~ ' a t� le '11~' ; to p "t; ~ t1ilta~r ft lv��' ciY:.~:...s;;;:a!J!!~t.~ �..~-ti.d 9!...' n1.-hc'tCk~~:;u4�~t~~a~ ~:J (U.e.r./ Jr$ � .:;~s, *�llt o antc / woioi wel'e 'to '11i ON~ th>\) ��~ ;-t~rn pt.lit+- of t~ e mldtllfl c .,.. p~ t~�nt o thf' 1.~1~ n bo t~ ~}~ring trl$ i>� isur p!'o� or c edtng tn the otftJJ~ t.lf' tr~fl: Collect r uust;o~a, ti. W flll..ge 't. - t th~ Ctl,t~t:et te:t WQJ'~ ~14ied to h;~ P'�t ~x �t . apQn ..ne eapttetn Q.f tM _oat "'I on* l''ruet� o I�larl1~to , an gent of one lJ ttl Jaco'P r Jo t ~Ulu. 336
_'.. ... 3 r ..i.' ~\1'"' ~. t ttl~� !.... .::-:4. 1r; 0 vo~1\ ;;.,. ... ~.u.~ \. v;.. \.;... 10 , l9 ~..... .~.: l l.~. fl� lid tr r ... i. ton i l c. \ t! ~..~ . � ::~c �..r� � ~ � �-� Col- 1 t 37
0 ( \} {e) r t tll�Jt' .., p r .o� 1. p i- �~!.to la d . o i ln r c ' r \' 338
.tl CIS ... c ~- ~' ..:..f. v . 16 . ion l' .. � � :u< l h-23'-h/l -'o .-:;. t 963.) � t' .... p ,., t .... ~� .lo ' :: :r v.,.s l, t l .. QBS c.t t'Q~ be1n u � e ., ,:. s(;..ry . eti.on to '/:GVfJ.,. t :1. e�al 1 t .l .Lip or t;l-lYY ll~ - �o �� .r - .' , or tu fol o - 339
(J � j 340
�l -l t p lt w - 1 f4 . r l ' 1 t1 t � 10 0 ci 0 t ~l ,. c I ;J 341
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9374)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-32 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-32)
- PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7853)
- HIMLAYANG PILIPINO PLANS, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8727)
- NIKKEN PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1569)
- CTA Case No. 5434 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5434)
- ITHIEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1672)
- CTA Case No. 4169 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4169)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。