[ G. R. No. 38872. May 03, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38872. May 03, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38872
[ G. R. No. 38872. May 03, 1934 ]
TOMAS REYES, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ARISTON BRODIT, ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
The Court having regularly acquired jurisdiction of tho above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision, after consideration thereof by the court upon the record its decision and order for Judgment having been filed on the 13th day of April, nineteen hundred and thirty-four;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that sail ease be dismissed, without prejudice to the intestate estates of the deceased Joaquln Regalado alias Go Suana and Placida Francisco. In view of the fact that the interests of eact of the intestate estates appear to be opposed to each other, the interested parties should proceed in court in accordance with the procedure prescribed by Act No. 190, to secure the appointment of another administrator for the intestate estate of Placida Francisco; and as the income of the properties in question is considerable, it is only proper that in the meantime they be not placed In the hands of the administrator appointed by the court, that the appointment of a receiver be requested, who shall administer the same in accordance with law. Without special pronouncement as to costs.
同类文件 SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 239385, April 17, 2024
- [ G.R. No. 120170. May 30, 2000 ](388 Phil. 129)
- [ G.R. No. 76873. October 26, 1989 ](258-A Phil. 467)
- [ G.R. No. 181467. August 06, 2008 ](583 Phil. 376)
- G.R. No. 178196, August 06, 2008
- [ G.R. No. 152774. May 27, 2004 ](473 Phil. 806)
- [ G.R. No. 190795. July 06, 2011 ](669 Phil. 93)
- G.R. NOS. 169727-28, August 18, 2006
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。