RMC No. 37-2011 — Revokes BIR Ruling No. DA-583-04 and defines the term “Special Purpose Vehicle” Digest | Full Text
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE Quezon City August 25, 2011 REVENUE MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 37-2011 SUBJECT : Revocation of BIR Ruling No. DA-583-04 and Definition of the term "Special Purpose Vehicle" TO : All Internal Revenue Officials, Employees and Others Concerned This Circular is being issued to inform all internal Revenue Officials, Employees and other concerned individuals of the revocation of BIR Ruling No. DA-583-04 (dated 15 November 2004) which provides that the special vehicle converted from a 2004 Cadillac De Ville base car model for exclusive use in the mortuary and funeral business of Rosehills Memorial Management Philippines, Inc. (Rosehills), for grieving relatives and/or friends to ride in, is among those considered as a special purpose vehicle (SPV) under Section 2 (g) of Revenue Regulations No. 25-2003, and is thus exempt from excise tax. Such Ruling, however, is erroneous, thereby the aforesaid vehicle should be subject to excise tax Section 2 (g) of Revenue Regulations No. 25-2003 provides: SEC. 2 DEFINITION OF TERMS. � For purposes of these Regulations, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning indicated below: xxx (g) SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLE � shall refer to a motor vehicle, other than truck, cargo van, jeep/jeepney/jeepney substitute, bus, single cab chassis as defined herein, designed for specific applications such as cement mixer, fire truck, boom truck, ambulance and/or medical unit, and off-road vehicles for heavy industries and not for recreational activities. For this purpose, "designed for specific applications" shall mean the motor vehicle is designed in such a manner that it can only be used strictly for the intended purpose for which it was manufactured. It is clear that an indispensable criterion for the classification of a vehicle as an SPV is that the vehicle, in its original state, must have been designed and manufactured for a specific purpose, and cannot therefore be utilized for any other function. In this regard, in order for a vehicle to be classified as a Special Purpose Vehicle, and therefore exempt from excise tax, the same must, in its original state, be ready for exclusive use for the specific purpose for which it is being categorized as a Special Purpose Vehicle, without necessity of any conversion, modification, renovation, adjustment or alteration to render it available for such use. All concerned are enjoined to be guided accordingly and give this Circular as wide publicity as possible. (Original Signed) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue
同类文件 Revenue Memorandum Circulars
- RMC No. 43-2008 — Authorizes the manual filing of tax returns of taxpayers enrolled in Electronic Filing and Payment System (eFPS) due to technical problems encountered in the eFPS environment Digest | Full Text(RMC No. 43-2008)
- RMC No. 19-2006 — Suspends the implementation of Revenue Memorandum Order No. 30-2005 re: issuance of TIN to SEC-registered taxpayers Digest | Full Text(RMC No. 19-2006)
- RMC No. 86-2021 — Circularizes the Memorandum of Agreement on Information Exchange and Reconciliation between Department of Energy, Bureau of Customs and Bureau of Internal Revenue Digest | Full Text | MOA(RMC No. 86-2021)
- RMC No. 92-2023 — Announces the availability of BIR Form No. 1621 in the Electronic Filing and Payment System (eFPS)(RMC No. 92-2023)
- RMC No. 1-2025 — Availability of the BIR Electronic Tax Clearance System for taxpayer-applicants registered under RR No. 7A-Quezon City, RR No. 7B-East NCR and RR No. 8B-South NCR(RMC No. 1-2025)
- RMC No. 65-2016 — Clarifies the proper due dates for filing of returns and payment of taxes for the purpose of imposition of penalties for late filing and/or late payment. Digest | Full Text(RMC No. 65-2016)
- RMC No. 72-2010 — Notifies the loss of several accountable forms Digest | Full Text(RMC No. 72-2010)
- RMC No. 61-2013 — Prohibits the printing of principal and supplementary receipts/invoices by non-accredited/unauthorized printers(RMC No. 61-2013)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。