Sep 24, 2012central bankgovernment securitiesjurisdictioncommercial lawinterpleader

Central Bank Independence vs. Contractual Obligations: Resolving Disputes Over Government Securities

The Supreme Court rules that the Bangko Sentral cannot adjudicate ownership disputes over government securities, and regular courts must resolve them.


When financial institutions trade government securities, disputes over ownership can arise long after the documents change hands. The question of who decides such disputes — the banking regulator or the regular courts — carries real consequences for everyone in the market. In Bank of Commerce v. Planters Development Bank and Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, G.R. Nos. 154470-71 and 154589-90 (September 24, 2012), the Supreme Court settled that question.

The dispute over P90 million in Central Bank bills

The controversy began in 1994 with two transactions involving Central Bank bills — securities issued by the Central Bank, now the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP).

In a transaction dated April 15, 1994, Planters Development Bank (PDB) agreed to sell P70 million in Treasury Bills to Bank of Commerce (BOC). Instead of delivering Treasury Bills, PDB delivered seven Central Bank bills with a total face value of P70 million, noting on the delivery receipt a substitution for the Treasury Bills. PDB kept the Detached Assignments — the documents used to effect a formal transfer.

A second transaction followed on April 19, 1994, involving two more Central Bank bills worth P20 million

Have a question about this topic?

This article is general information, not legal advice. Ask ASG Legal AI for a cited, plain-language answer on your own situation — free, no sign-up.