Jun 17, 2015foreclosureredemptionwrit of possessionextrajudicial foreclosureproperty law

Redemption Rights and Time Limits: When the Clock Stops Ticking in Foreclosures

Understand when a foreclosure buyer gets possession, how redemption periods work, and why a donation mortis causa needs probate.


In extrajudicial foreclosures, timing is everything. The redemption period—the window when a mortgagor can reclaim the property—determines who holds the keys afterward. But what happens when someone claims ownership through a donation that was never probated? A 2015 Supreme Court ruling clarifies the rules on possession after foreclosure and the consequences of an unprobated donation.

The Case: Bascara v. Javier

Reynaldo Bascara claimed ownership of a Pasay City property through a donation mortis causa from his aunt, Rosalina Pardo. The problem? Pardo had allegedly mortgaged the same property to Evangeline Pangilinan in 2004—more than a year after Pardo died in May 2003.

When Pardo's loan went unpaid, the property was foreclosed and sold at public auction to Pangilinan. After the one-year redemption period lapsed without redemption, Pangilinan obtained a new title and sought a writ of possession. Bascara opposed, arguing the mortgage was fraudulent because Pardo was already dead when it was executed.

The Issue

Could Bascara block the writ of possession by claiming he was a third party holding the property adversely to the mortgagor? And did his alleged donation give him any right to the property before probate?

The Ruling

The Supreme Court denied Bascara's petition and affirmed the issuance of the writ of possession in favor of Pangilinan.

On the writ of possession: Under Section 7 of Act No. 3135, as amended, the purchaser in an extrajudicial foreclosure sale may petition the Regional Trial Court for possession. During the redemption period, the purchaser must post a bond equivalent to twelve months' use of the property. After the period expires without redemption, no bond is required—the purchaser becomes the absolute owner and the court's duty to issue the writ becomes ministerial.

On the third-party exception: The Rules of Court provide that possession shall be given to the purchaser unless a third party is actually holding the property adversely to the judgment obligor. The exact provision is not available in the ASG law library, but the principle as applied in this case is clear: the exception applies only to those with an independent right of possession—such as co-owners, agricultural tenants, or usufructuaries—not to successors or transferees who merely step into the shoes of the mortgagor.

Bascara, as an alleged transferee through donation, had no independent right of possession. He merely stood in Pardo's position. The court therefore had a ministerial duty to issue the writ.

On the donation: A donation mortis causa—one that takes effect upon death—partakes of the nature of a testamentary provision. Under Article 728 of the Civil Code, it is governed by the rules on succession. This means it must comply with the formalities of a will under Articles 805 and 806 of the Civil Code, and it must be probated. Until probate, no right to the property is transmitted to the donee. Bascara's unprobated donation gave him no enforceable right.

Practical Takeaways

  • Redemption periods are strict. If a mortgagor fails to redeem within one year from registration of the foreclosure sale, the purchaser becomes the absolute owner and may demand possession without posting a bond.
  • A writ of possession is usually ministerial. Once the redemption period lapses and title is consolidated, courts generally must issue the writ—pending cases questioning the mortgage's validity do not stay it.
  • The third-party exception is narrow. Only those with an independent, adverse right (like co-owners or tenants) can block a writ. Successors-in-interest of the mortgagor cannot.
  • Donations mortis causa require probate. A deed of donation taking effect upon death is treated like a will. Without probate, it transmits no rights.
  • Act quickly on irregularities. If a mortgage appears fraudulent, challenge it directly and promptly—do not rely on possession alone to resist a foreclosure buyer.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

Have a question about this topic?

This article is general information, not legal advice. Ask ASG Legal AI for a cited, plain-language answer on your own situation — free, no sign-up.