Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 2539 of 39 articles for cta en banc

Prescription in Tax Assessment: Taxpayers' Right to a Timely Assessment

When does the BIR lose its right to assess taxes? The Supreme Court clarifies prescription rules and valid waivers in CIR v. BPI.

Untangling VAT Refund Claims Navigating Deadlines for Zero-Rated Sales

Learn how the Supreme Court clarified the mandatory deadlines for VAT refund claims on zero-rated sales, and why missing them is fatal.

VAT Refund Claims: Why the 120-Day Rule Is Jurisdictional and Deadlines Matter

Learn how the Supreme Court's ruling in Aichi Forging clarifies the mandatory 120-day VAT refund waiting period and its impact on taxpayers.

Tax Assumption vs. Tax Exemption: The Mitsubishi Ruling on Government-Promised Tax Relief

The Supreme Court clarifies when a government's promise to assume taxes binds the state—and when it doesn't—in this landmark Philippine tax case.

Reckoning the Two-Year Prescriptive Period for DST Refund Claims: PBCom v. CIR

When does the two-year prescriptive period for a documentary stamp tax refund claim begin for metering machine users? The Supreme Court settles the rule.

Navigating VAT Refund Timelines: How Premature Filing Can Still Succeed Under Equitable Estoppel

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when premature VAT refund claims may still prosper under equitable estoppel from BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Duty Free Philippines v. BIR: The Perils of Skipping the CTA En Banc on Appeal

A direct appeal to the Supreme Court from a CTA Division ruling is fatal. Learn the correct appellate route under R.A. 9282.

PEZA Tax Exemption Clarified: Who Can Claim Excise Tax Refunds

Supreme Court clarifies that PEZA-registered enterprises can claim excise tax refunds on petroleum products used indirectly in their operations.

Strict Compliance: The Mandatory Nature of VAT Refund Periods Under the NIRC

The Supreme Court rules that the 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims are mandatory and jurisdictional, dismissing a belated judicial claim.

Untangling Time: When Does the Clock Start Ticking for Relief from Judgment?

Explaining the 60-day and 6-month periods for filing a petition for relief from judgment under Rule 38, as clarified by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Tax Appeals an

Philippine Supreme Court Clarifies Documentary Stamp Tax on Passbook Savings Accounts

The Supreme Court rules that passbook savings accounts with higher interest rates are certificates of deposit subject to documentary stamp tax.

Pawnshops and VAT: Clarifying Tax Exemptions for Non-Bank Financial Intermediaries

The Supreme Court clarifies that pawnshops, as non-bank financial intermediaries, were not liable for VAT in 2000 due to deferred effectivity.

Sales Invoice Suffices for VAT Refund Claims: Disparity Between Goods and Services Eliminated

Supreme Court rules sales invoices can substantiate VAT refund claims for zero-rated services, not just official receipts.

Off-Line International Carriers Taxed at 32% on Philippine Income, SC Rules

SC clarifies off-line carriers selling tickets in PH pay 32% income tax, not 2.5% GPB rate; refund claim remanded.

Documentary Stamp Tax: When Special Savings Deposits Are Certificates of Deposit Drawing Interest

The Supreme Court rules that special savings deposits with fixed-term features are "certificates of deposit drawing interest" subject to documentary stamp tax.