Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Understanding Sexual Assault and Lascivious Conduct: Insights from a Landmark Philippine Case
A stepfather's conviction clarifies the distinction between sexual assault and lascivious conduct, and how moral ascendancy substitutes for force in rape cases.
Judge Dismissed for Gross Immorality: Extramarital Affair and Its Professional Consequences
A judge's extramarital affair leads to dismissal from service and suspension from law practice, underscoring strict moral standards for the judiciary.
Moral Ascendancy in Rape Cases: What People v. XXX Means for Philippine Law
The Supreme Court affirms that a relative's moral ascendancy can substitute for force or intimidation in proving qualified rape.
Moral Ascendancy in Rape Cases: What the Supreme Court Ruling Means
A 2020 Supreme Court ruling clarifies how moral ascendancy can replace force or intimidation in rape cases involving relatives.
The Condonation Doctrine After Carpio-Morales: Recall Elections and the Cutoff Date
The Supreme Court clarifies when the abandoned condonation doctrine still applies and confirms it covers recall elections.
Moral Ascendancy and Statutory Rape: Insights from a Philippine Supreme Court Decision
The Supreme Court affirms a statutory rape conviction, explaining how moral ascendancy and recantation are treated under Philippine law.
Judicial Misconduct Lessons from a Case of Immorality and Absenteeism
A retired judge's continued cohabitation with his mistress led to disbarment. Learn the ethical standards lawyers must uphold.
Understanding Gross Immorality When Personal Conduct Leads to Disbarment in the Philippines
The Supreme Court disbarred a lawyer-judge for continuing an illicit relationship despite prior warning. Learn the rules on gross immorality.
Lawyer-Client Relationship and Professional Ethics: Lessons from Zamora v. Gallanosa
When does a lawyer-client relationship begin, and what happens when a lawyer abandons a case? The Supreme Court clarifies in Zamora v. Gallanosa.
Understanding Gross Immorality in Legal Practice: Insights From a Landmark Disbarment Case
A Supreme Court disbarment case clarifies when a lawyer's extramarital affairs constitute gross immorality under the Code of Professional Responsibility.
Disgraceful and Immoral Conduct: Supreme Court Ruling on Judicial Ethics
The Supreme Court holds court employees accountable for disgraceful and immoral conduct, even after resignation. Learn the rules and penalties.
Understanding Incestuous Rape Legal Insights AND Protections FOR Minors IN THE Philippines
The Supreme Court affirms 14 convictions for incestuous rape of minors, explaining the legal elements, penalties, and why a father's moral ascendancy substitutes for force.
Gross Immorality and Bigamy: What Lawyers Risk in the Philippines
A Supreme Court ruling explains how bigamy and extra-marital affairs violate the lawyer's duty of good moral character.
Understanding Lawyer Disbarment: How Gross Immorality Ends a Legal Career in the Philippines
The Supreme Court disbarred a lawyer for bigamous marriage and abetting others' bigamy, explaining gross immorality as a ground for disbarment.
Judge Dismissed and Suspended From Law Practice for Gross Immorality: A.M. No. MTJ-24-031
Supreme Court dismisses a judge for an extramarital affair and suspends him from law practice for three years, balancing penalties with mitigating circumstances.
When a Judge's Private Misconduct Becomes a Public Offense
The Supreme Court dismissed a judge for gross immorality after an extramarital affair, showing how private conduct affects judicial office.
Moral Character and Bar Admission: Overcoming Obstacles to Legal Practice
How the Supreme Court weighed pending criminal cases against moral fitness in bar admission, and when a bar applicant may finally take the oath.
When Lawyers May Mention Administrative Complaints: Zamora v. Mahinay
The Supreme Court clarifies when a lawyer's mention of an administrative complaint against a judge crosses the line from zealous advocacy to professional misconduct.
Zealous Advocacy vs. Threats to Judicial Integrity: The Zamora v. Mahinay Standard
The Supreme Court clarifies when a lawyer's vigorous motion crosses the line into an unethical threat against a judge.
When Lawyer Zeal Crosses the Line: Lessons from Zamora v. Mahinay
The Supreme Court clarifies when a lawyer's vigorous advocacy becomes an ethical violation, and when it remains protected professional duty.
Conflict of Interest and Gross Immorality: Lessons from a Lawyer's Disbarment
A Philippine lawyer was disbarred for conflict of interest and gross immorality. Learn the ethical rules and practical lessons.
Judges and Lawyers Face Discipline for Extramarital Affairs: The Aranas Case
The Supreme Court dismissed a judge and suspended him from law practice for gross immorality arising from an extramarital affair.
Judge Dismissed for Gross Immorality: Extramarital Affair and Disciplinary Action
The Supreme Court dismissed a judge for gross immorality over an extramarital affair and suspended him from law practice for three years.
Disbarment for Adultery and Abandonment: Moral Standards for Philippine Lawyers
The Supreme Court disbarred a lawyer for adultery and abandoning his family, reaffirming that private misconduct reflects on fitness to practice law.