CTA Case No. 265 (Decision)

I' li.I .. ~~~ � �r�u� � �~, ry?1 1�� �- -- . -. -. - -- - . - - --� t I0 is � an appeal f ectsi n f rea- llect lntt~nal - !�n � h 1 1n tit! f pa nt { t f l .24 .1 � aa1ea tax t lattezo'� &.Jeii;. .IDtl" 1, 1 ~. � fr ary 1~ . l 1 .,... . it. � � t 1� 1 ef f ts� hlch rea �� f 11 � �~ 18 0

� 26 �1 lC .... "

�2 - 3- -- r h t h only 1n n- e is .. v lv ln th1tf � fee 1 � c c � cu y, I C te 1 � . 11 t y1 at tr � 1 t ~ r- ��tf. ' .r � ~~ v. "1 � .A. � 21 ' c: � t � o. � � � 11. �1 1 42 \

� �2~ - 4- .. t Bl ten he t\ll r r . it � 2.0l .. 183

_.. � 26 - tt r of tt v 11 ty � rP t d ,J n 21 , 1~54 lt ip r c in () venJ c It crnt� ut rl f- f Pll 1 r the val c � 1n c o ct n ... r1 J ~ 19 nt t VI S 1 u ry a er eer p 1" cc unt � ty r v l <11 y _ ~ln e n '1 t 1 1 t, c f. a 1 1 ~. - c:h 1 P r. ~. t t 1n .J no 21 , 1 � �u y � � 1 ner. � ts .. . 484

� -- � 11 � u � ., 4 5